The Tamil Nadu v. Palaniyammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court order dated 30-10-2025 by Mummineni Sudheer Kumar J. in CMP Nos. 19391 & 19392 of 2021 in Second Appeal SA No. 1245 of 2008: setting aside of abatement caused by the death of the 6th respondent; impleadment of proposed respondents 17 & 18 (C.Ramasamy and C.Rajammal) as legal representatives; condonation of delay by separate order; appellant Tamil Nadu Industrial Investments Corporation Ltd; respondent No. 2 represented by Ms.K.Megala for Mr.N.Manokaran; no statutory provisions, no precedents cited, no monetary quantum; administrative/procedural disposal only.
What did the court decide?
Both CMPs ordered: the abatement caused by the death of the 6th respondent in SA No. 1245 of 2008 is set aside and proposed respondents 17 & 18 (C.Ramasamy and C.Rajammal) are impleaded as respondents 17 & 18; Registry directed to carry out necessary amendment.