Madras High Court; C.M.P.No.18893 of 2024 in S.A.No.620 of 2009; restoration of second appeal dismissed for default on 21.10.2019; petition allowed, second appeal restored on file; N. Sathish Kumar J.; order dated 21.02.2025; no statute or precedent discussed.
Restoration of Second Appeal S.A.No.620 of 2009 to file (previously dismissed for default on 21.10.2019). ¶27
The Court was satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the restoration petition. ¶23
C.M.P.No.18893 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.02.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.M.P.No.18893 of 2024 in S.A.No.620 of 2009
Kalaiselvan
... Petitioner/Appellant
-vs-
O R D E R
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed restore the
Second Appeal, which was dismissed for default on 21.10.2019. The 1 st
Respondent has no objection in allowing this petition. Though notice has
been served on the other respondents, there was no representation on behalf
of them.
2. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit, this
1/2
C.M.P.No.18893 of 2024
petition is allowed and the Second Appeal is restored on file.
21.02.2025
ar
1/2
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking restoration of Second Appeal S.A.No.620 of 2009, which was dismissed for default on 21.10.2019, should be allowed.¶18
The Court was satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the restoration petition.ratio¶23
How this case reached the court
Second Appeal S.A.No.620 of 2009 dismissed for default¶19
High Court of Judicature at Madras · 21.10.2019
Second Appeal S.A.No.620 of 2009, before the High Court of Judicature at Madras, was dismissed for default on 21.10.2019.¶19
Civil Miscellaneous Petition C.M.P.No.18893 of 2024 filed to restore the dismissed Second Appeal.¶18
At the time of hearing, the 1st Respondent had no objection to allowing the petition; notice served on the other respondents drew no representation.¶20
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
