Allowed

M.Rajavelu (Deceased) 1. R.Thara Chowdry, v. Sri Lakshmi Chit Fund Corporation

Madras HC7 Aug 2025CMP/17688/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applications to condone a 504-day delay in filing petitions to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant in a second appeal and to set aside abatement were allowed after the court took all facts into consideration.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 504 days condoned; legal representatives of deceased appellant brought on record.

M.Rajavelu (Deceased) 1. R.Thara Chowdry, Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CMP Nos.17688, 17689 & 17690 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-08-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN CMP Nos.17688, 17689 & 17690 of 2025 in S.A.No.997 of 2009

¶5

M.Rajavelu (Deceased) 1. R.Thara Chowdry, W/o.Late Rajavelu, residing at Door No.5, Perumal Kovil Street, Krishnapuram, Ambur, Vellore District. and 2 Others

¶6

Applicants in all petitions

¶7

¶8

Sri Lakshmi Chit Fund Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Partner, R.Ramasamy, 12, Gangapuram Village and Post, Ambur (Via), Vellore District. R.Ramasamy (Deceased) S/o.Raja Naidu, 12, Gangapuram Village and Post, Ambur (Via), Vellore District.

¶9

and 5 Others

¶10

Respondents in all petitions

¶11

In all petitions For Appellant(s):

¶12

Mr.S.Baskaran

¶13

For Respondent(s):

¶14

Mr.T.R.Rajaraman for R1 Mr.P.Veenasuresh for R3 to R7

¶15

COMMON ORDER

¶16

These three applications have been filed to condone the delay of 504

¶17

days in filing the petition to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant, to set aside abatement and to bring on record his legal representatives.

¶18

1/2

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

CMP Nos.17688, 17689 & 17690 of 2025

¶21

C.V. KARTHIKEYAN,J.,

¶22

vum

¶23

2. In the common affidavit filed in support of the petitions, it had

¶24

been stated that the 2^nd respondent had also died and the application had been filed to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 2^nd respondent. The matter was then listed on 17.03.2025 when it was informed that the appellant had also died. Thereafter the applications have to be filed to bring on record the legal representatives. This caused the delay and the application has been filed to condone the delay.

¶25

3. Heard the learned counsel for the respondents.

¶26

4. Taking all the facts into consideration, these applications are allowed. The delay is condoned. The legal representatives of the deceased appellant are brought on record .

07-08-2025

(½)

vum

CMP Nos.17688, 17689 & 17690 of 2025 in S.A.No.997 of 2009

¶31

2/2

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Rajavelu (Deceased) 1. R.Thara Chowdry, v. Sri Lakshmi Chit Fund Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Rajavelu (Deceased) 1. R.Thara Chowdry, v. Sri Lakshmi Chit Fund Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arulmigu Kasiviswanathar Thirukoil Vs P.N.Poonusamy Mudaliar (Decd.) Kumari Baby Alias Thilakavathi (Decd) 1.DEVAKI Ammal

Mukund Lal Chandak Vs Yogendra Chandak

Muvalla Chandravathy Vs Chengamma

N.Arikrishnan, Vs Valliammai @ Deivanai

V.Kamadhenu Vs v.Arumugam

M. Renganathan (Died) 1. T.R. Vasanthakumari Vs the Corporation of Chennai