Allowed¶27

V.Vasanthi v. v.Sakthikumar

Madras HC15 Dec 2025CMP/16067/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Substituted service; service by publication; Malai Malar newspaper; Coimbatore circulation; notice returned unserved - respondents left last known address; CMP No. 16067 of 2025; CMP.No.21746 of 2024; A.S.SR.No.96101 of 2024; High Court of Judicature at Madras; publication deadline 26.12.2025; hearing/listing date 30.01.2026; appellant Mrs. V. Vasanthi; respondent V. Sakthikumar; advocate Venkatesh S.; judge C.V. Karthikeyan; judge K. Kumaresh Babu.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to effect substituted service by publication in any one issue of "Malai Malar" having circulation at Coimbatore; publication on or before 26.12.2025 indicating hearing date 30.01.2026; appeal suit listed on 30.01.2026. ¶27

V.Vasanthi Vs v.Sakthikumar — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP No. 16067 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15-12-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

CMP No. 16067 of 2025 in CMP.No.21746 of 2024 IN AS SR NO. 96101 OF 2024

¶7

Mrs.V.Vasanthi W/o.Late P.Venkataramakrishnan, Door No.43/1, Thadagam Road, TVS Nagar, Velandipalayam Post, Coimbatore

¶8

Appellant(s)

¶9

¶10

V.Sakthikumar S/o. P.Vadivel Nadar, D.No.6D, Durga Nagar, Opp.to Chavra School, Somayampalayam, Bharathiyar University Post, Coimbatore.

¶11

Respondent(s)

¶12

For Appellant(s): Mr.Venkatesh S.

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.)

¶15

The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed, seeking permission to effect service on the respondents through Substituted Service.

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CMP No. 16067 of 2025

¶19

In the affidavit, it had been contended that notice had been directed to

¶20

the respondents at their last known address at Coimbatore. However, the notice could not be served and it had been returned, stating that the respondents had left.

¶21