Dismissed¶25

Revenue Divisional Officer, v. N Rajendran

Condonation of delay – Order 41 Rule 3A CPC

Madras HC21 Jul 2025CMP/13078/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran, dismisses CMP.No.13078 of 2025 under Order 41 Rule 3A CPC seeking condonation of 609-day delay in filing AS.SR.No.77948 of 2025 against judgment/decree dated 28.04.2023 in LAOP.No.1 of 2011 (Sub Court, Maduranthakam) enhancing land acquisition compensation from Rs.250 to Rs.6,540 per cent; State delayed despite notice of execution petitions; no satisfactory explanation; connected appeal SR closed.

What did the court decide?

There are no merits in condoning the enormous delay of 609 days, as no proper and satisfactory explanation was offered; the condonation petition is dismissed. ¶25

Revenue Divisional Officer, Vs N Rajendran — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP.No.13078 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.07.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

CMP.No.13078 of 2025 in AS.SR.No.77948 of 2025

¶7

Revenue Divisional Officer, Maduranthakam ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.N.Rajendran 2. R.Pratheep Vaidegi(died) 3. Kavitha ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer: This petition has been filed under Order 41 Rule 3A of CPC pleased to condone the delay of 609 days in filing the above appeal suit against the judgement and decree dated 22.01.2018 made in LAOP.No.1 of 2011 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Siddharth, Additional Government Pleader For Respondents : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan for R1 to R3

¶12

1/5

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

CMP.No.13078 of 2025

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

Appeal is filed against the Judgement and Decree passed by the Sub Court, Maduranthakam in LAOP.No.1 of 2011 dated 28.04.2023, in respect of the land acquisition proceedings initiated in the year 1992 for the formation of East Coast Road.

¶17

The case has a chequered history. The notification dated 16.09.1992 culminated in passing of award on 14.09.1995 fixing Rs.250/per cent for the land acquired. This was challenged before the Division Bench of this Court and taking note of the fact that no compensation had been paid up to 2008, the Division Bench of this Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, treating 2008 as the year of acquisition, and directed compensation to be assessed accordingly. Pursuant to that order, the reference Court fixed compensation at Rs.6,540/- per cent and passed its award on 28.04.2023.

¶18

Immediately, the land owners are filed execution petitions before the Sub Court, Maduranthakam. After notice on behalf of the State, appeared on 05.06.2024 and undertook to file Vakalat on behalf of the State. Nearly after one year, the present appeal is filed on 02.04.2025 with application to condone the delay of 609 days.

¶19

2/5

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

CMP.No.13078 of 2025

¶22

The land owners been deprived of their lands on 16.09.1992

¶23

when the notification was issued. Finally, an award in their favour was passed on 28.04.2023 after one round of litigation. The present appeal is filed on 02.04.2025 with delay, despite the respondents/land owners had filed execution petitions and the State was put to notice about the execution petitions.

¶24

Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case and

¶25

submissions by both counsel, this Court finds no merits to condone the enormous delay of 609 days without proper and satisfactory explanation and hence, this petition stands dismissed. Consequently, the connected AS.SR.No.77948 of 2025 is also closed.

21.07.2024

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CMP.No.13078 of 2025

¶31

¶32

1. The Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam.