Allowed¶7
Nagammal v. Kamalam(died) 1.M.RAMAMURTHY
Madras HCCMP/10181/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Routine impleading/succession-to-litigation order in a pending Madras High Court second appeal (SA No.427 of 2008): legal representatives (wife and daughter) of deceased 4th appellant Moorthy brought on record as appellants 6 & 7 via CMP.No.10181 of 2025; no objection from respondents; Registry amendment directed; no substantive statutory or precedent analysis.
What did the court decide?
Impleading of proposed petitioners 5 and 6 as appellants 6 & 7 in SA No.427 of 2008 as the other legal heirs of the deceased 4th appellant, with the Registry directed to carry out the necessary amendment. ¶7