Disposed¶22

Maharunnisha v. R.Tharmavasan

Madras HC19 Jun 2025CMA/1691/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court CMA No. 1691 of 2024 (decision 19-06-2025), Maharunnisha v. R.Tharmavasan and Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd; motor accident compensation enhancement appeal under Sec.173 of Motor Vehicles Act against Tribunal award in MCOP No.4529 of 2017 dated 27.02.2023 (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai); appeal disposed of on a joint-memo compromise settlement between appellant and second respondent; award passed in terms of compromise; joint memo forms part of judgment; no costs; decided by T.V.ThamilSelvi J.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of in accordance with the parties' compromise recorded in the joint memo, with the award passed accordingly; joint memo made part of the judgment; no costs awarded. ¶22

Maharunnisha Vs R.Tharmavasan — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CMA No. 1691 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 19-06-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

CMA No. 1691 of 2024

MAHARUNNISHA

Appellant(s)

R.Tharmavasan

¶11

2.Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd No.6, 4th Floor, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 006.

¶12

Respondent(s)

¶13

PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Sec.173 of Motor Vehicles Act, praying t o modify the impugned order dated 27.02.2023, in MCOP No.4529 of 2017 by adequately enhancing the compensation awarded under various heads.

¶14

For Appellant : Mr.S.Ravi Kumar

¶15

For Respondents: M/s.P.Suresh Srinivasan For R2 R1 - Dispensed With

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CMA No. 1691 of 2024

¶19

JUDGEMENT

¶20

The petitioner not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MCOP No.4529 of 2017, dated 27.02.2023 has preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation.

¶21

2.Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel for appellant and 2nd respondent appeared and submitted that a compromise was arrived between the parties, to that effect, a joint memo was filed for recording settlement.

¶22

In view of joint memo for recording settlement filed by learned counsel for respondents and in terms of compromise, the award is passed. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of. The Joint memo is forming part and parcel of this judgment. No costs.

¶23

19-06-2025

¶24

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rpp

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

CMA No. 1691 of 2024

¶28

¶29