Disposed

The Authorised Signatory v. Srinivasan

Madras HC2 Jun 2025CMA/1324/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Insurance company's appeal in a motor accident claim was listed for being mentioned. The court corrected an erroneous paragraph in its earlier judgment, replacing it with directions fixing 75% liability and deposit obligations on the 4th respondent.

What did the court decide?

Registry directed to issue fresh order copy; Paragraph 7 of the earlier judgment replaced with corrected directions on liability and deposit.

The Authorised Signatory Vs Srinivasan — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CMA NO. 1324 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2025

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶4

CMA NO. 1324 of 2025

¶5

AND

¶6

CMP NO. 11256 OF 2025

¶7

The Authorised Signatory

¶8

Rep by the Branch Manager, M/s. United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Vellore.

¶9

Appellant(s)

¶10

¶11

Srinivasan S/o. P. Vairavan, N.No.75, O.No.29-A, Pappathi Amman Koil St, Sathuvachari, Vellore 632 009. and 7 Others

¶12

Respondent(s)

¶13

CMP NO. 11256 of 2025

¶14

The Authorised Signatory rep by the Branch Manager, M/s. United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Vellore.

Appellant(s)

Srinivasan

S/o. P. Vairavan, N.No.75, O.No.29-A, Pappathi Amman Koil St, Sathuvachari, Vellore 632 009. and 7 Others

¶19

Respondent(s)

¶20

1\4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

For Appellant(s) : Mr.S.Arunkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Sivakumar for R1 Mrs.R.Sreevidhya for R4

¶23

R2, 3, 5, 6 & 7 - Dispensed With

¶24

ORDER

¶25

The above matter has been posted under the caption “For being mentioned” today at the behest of the learned counsel appearing for the appellants.

¶26

2.By an oversight, at Paragraph No.7, the words “... this Court is inclined to fix 25% of liability on the petitioner and 75% of liability on the 4^th respondent. As the 4^th respondent already deposited 50% of medical expenses, the remaining 25% of medical expenses out of Rs.2,38,500/- is directed to be paid by the 4^th respondent to the 1^st respondent/claimant within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment.” have been added in the Judgment of this Court dated 02.06.2025 and the same has to be deleted.

¶27

2\4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

3.Hence, at Para 7, the words shall be replaced with “... this Court is inclined to fix 25% of liability on the petitioner and 75% of liability on the 4^th respondent, as the 4^th respondent already deposited 50% of medical expenses. The 4^th respondent is directed to deposit 75% of the award amount along with interest @7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit, less the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The 1^st respondent is permitted to withdraw the said amount before the Tribunal by making necessary applications.”

¶30

Registry is directed to issue a fresh order copy.

¶31

15-07-2025

¶32

mps To

¶33

1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Vellore.

¶34

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court.

¶35

3\4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶38

mps

¶39

CMA NO. 1324 of 2025 AND CMP NO. 11256 OF 2025

¶40

15.07.2025

¶41

4\4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Authorised Signatory v. Srinivasan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Authorised Signatory v. Srinivasan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Aruchamy Vs Inspector General of Registration

Jags Educational Trust Vs the Temple Administration

Jags Educational Trust Vs the Temple Administration

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs P. Suresh

Sellammal Vs N.Balasubramanian

Balaji Vs Prakash