Ramesh v. Navamani
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the CPC by Ramesh and Anitha. The court noted the absence of the appellants on the day of hearing. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for default.
What did the court decide?
The appeal suit is dismissed for default. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
What the court decided
A.S.No.89 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
A.S.No.89 of 2017
1.Ramesh 2.Anitha
...Appellants
Vs.
1.Navamani 2.Manivannan
...Respondents
PRAYER: First Appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree passed in OS No.31 of 2011 dated 26.10.2016 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri.
For Appellants : No appearance For R1 : Mr.S.Velmurugan For R2 : No appearance
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present First Appeal shall be allowed when no representation was filed by the appellants on the date of hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramesh
- appellant
Anitha
- respondent
Navamani
- respondent
Manivannan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court