Madras High Court dismisses appeal as abated after respondents died and appellants failed to bring legal heirs on record.
Appeal dismissed as abated; connected miscellaneous petition closed. ¶¶15-¶16
The appeal suit is dismissed as abated because notice to respondents 1 and 2 were returned as 'died' and no steps were taken to implead their legal heirs. ¶¶13-¶15
A.S.No.687 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.02.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. SIVAGNANAM
A.S.No.687 of 2014 and M.P. No. 1 of 2014
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code against the fair order made in I.A.No.382 of 2010 in O.S.No.444/2004 in the final decree proceedings dated 12.04.2013 on the file of Additional District Judge, Kancheepuram at Chengalpattu.
For Petitioner : Mr K. Sukumaran 1/3
A.S.No.687 of 2014
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is noticed that notice to the respondents 1 and 2 were returned as "died" on 21.08.2020.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.02.2025
Index: yes/no Internet:yes/no mrp To
The Additional District Judge, Kancheepuram at Chengalpattu
V. SIVAGNANAM, J.
2/3
A.S.No.687 of 2014
mrp
A.S.No.687 of 2014
04.02.2025
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal abates on account of death of respondents 1 and 2 and non-impleadment of their legal heirs.medium confidence¶¶13-¶15
1 provisions across 1 enactments
How this case reached the court
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
