Dismissed¶22

Malarvizhi v. S.Udayakumar

Madras HC7 Aug 2025AS/521/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, A.S.No.521 of 2023, decided 07.08.2025 by Justice J.Nisha Banu and Justice M.Jothiraman. Appellants Malarvizhi W/o Pazhanisami and Thenmozhi W/o K.Parthiban withdrew their appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 27.03.2023 in O.S.No.14 of 2017 (II Additional District Judge, Tindivanam) against respondents S.Udayakumar and S.Karthikeyan S/o V.Subramani, after settling the matter out of court; appeal dismissed as withdrawn, no costs. Counsel: A.E.Ravichandran (appellants), S.Madhar Khan (R1), G.Sumitra (R2).

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn (permission to withdraw granted); no costs awarded. ¶22

Malarvizhi Vs S.Udayakumar — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A.S.No.521 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.08.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

¶7

A.S.No.521 of 2023

¶8

Malarvizhi W/o Pazhanisami

¶9

Thenmozhi, W/o K.Parthiban ..Appellants

¶10

Vs.

¶11

S.Udayakumar, S/o V.Subramani.

¶12

S.Karthikeyan, S/o V.Subramani ..Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. against the judgment

¶14

and decree dted 27.03.2023 made in O.S.No.14 of 2017 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Tindivanam.

¶15

For Petitioner	: Mr.A.E.Ravichandran
For Respondent	: Mr.S.Madhar Khan for R1
	Ms.G.Sumitra for R2

¶16

Page 1 of 3

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

A.S.No.521 of 2023

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Learned counsel for the appellants would state that the issue

¶21

involved in this appeal has been settled out of court and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

¶22