Disposed¶18

Tata Capital Ltd. v. Bondalapati Venkatarao

Madras HC14 Oct 2025Arb Appln/826/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 interim relief; Order XIV Rule 8 O.S. Rules; prayer for Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver financed Mahindra TUV300 (Regn. No.AP31EJ0630) from respondent's premises in Guntur with police aid; Tata Capital Limited v. Bondalapati Venkatarao; application stands closed as loan account settled and closed; no interim measure ordered; Madras High Court, 14.10.2025.

What did the court decide?

Recording the learned counsel for applicant's submission that the account has been settled and closed, this Arbitration Application stands closed. ¶18

Tata Capital Ltd. Vs Bondalapati Venkatarao — Arbitration | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Arbitration Application No.826 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.10.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Arbitration Application No.826 of 2025

¶7

Tata Capital Limited By its Associate Legal Remedial R.Kamalakkannan Having its office at I Floor Centennials Square 6A, Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam Chennai – 600 024. .... Applicant

¶8

¶9

Mr.Bondalapati Venkatarao H No. 12 7 89 1 Rajagari Choutry Guntur, Landmark – Rajagari Satram Guntur, Andhra Pradesh Pin Code – 522 001. ..... Respondent

¶10

Prayer : Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Section 9(II)(b)(d)&(e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to pass an order appointing an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the Mahindra TUV300 T10AS MHAWK100 Model bearing Engine No.VZH6M92158, CHASIS No.MA1NA2VZEJ6A38591 bearing Registration No.AP31EJ0630 with all accessories fitted to the Vehicle Lying at H No 12 7 89 1 Rajagari Choutry, Guntur, Landmark – Rajagari Satram, Guntur, Andhra

¶11

1/3

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

Arbitration Application No.826 of 2025

¶14

Pradesh, Pin code – 522 001 or morefully described hereunder, with police aid or break open the premises from wherever found and handover the same to the applicant.

¶15

For Applicant : Mr.N.K.Vanan For Respondent : Mr.Suresh Kumar Advocate Commissioner

¶16

ORDER

¶17

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for applicant submitted that the account has been settled and closed.

¶18