Tata Capital Ltd. v. Sri Amman hydrolic and welding works
Case brief
What is this about?
ARB.APPLN.No.771 of 2025, Madras High Court, decided 16.09.2025 by N. Anand Venkatesh, J. TATA Capital Limited (applicant, through Mr.N.K.Vanan) versus Sri Amman Hydrolic & Welding Works (respondent, through Mr.Ma.Pa.Thangavel). Application under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S Rules read with Section 9(ii)(b), (d) and (e) of Arbitration Act, 1996 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to seize a TATA HITACHI ZAXIS 220 LC excavator (Engine/Chasis No. THEDCRL0L00010197) with police aid. Advocate Commissioner R.M.D.Nasrullah sought withdrawal of warrant; respondent reported dues settled except August 2025 instalment; statement of claim received from Tribunal. Application closed, no order as to costs. Keywords: Section 9 interim measures, Advocate Commissioner, seizure of financed vehicle, settlement of instalments, arbitration application closed.
What did the court decide?
In light of the development that only one instalment for the month of August 2025 remained payable, no further orders were required to be passed in the application; the application was accordingly closed, with no order as to costs.