Dismissed¶18

M/s Indusind Bank Ltd. v. G Devaraj

Madras HC17 Feb 2025Arb Appln/446/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; Arb Appln No. 446 of 2024; IndusInd Bank Ltd. v. G Devaraj; Abdul Quddhose J.; 17-02-2025; application dismissed as withdrawn; vehicle untraceable; Advocate Commissioner unable to execute warrant of commission; liberty to file fresh application for appointment of Advocate Commissioner; retention of same Advocate Commissioner; initial remuneration already paid.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner if the vehicle is traceable, with consideration of retaining the same Advocate Commissioner. ¶18

M/s Indusind Bank Ltd. Vs G Devaraj — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Arb Appln NO. 446 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-02-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb Appln No. 446 of 2024

¶5

M/s Indusind Bank Ltd M/s. IndusInd Bank Ltd., Rep. By Its Assistant Vice President, A. Ganesh Kumar, Having office at - Consumer Finance Division, No. 34, G N Chetty Road, T Nagar , Chennai 600017.

¶6

Appellant(s)

¶7

¶8

G Devaraj 1-224, Sikkampatti, Veppilai Muthampatti, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu 635 301.M/s. IndusInd Bank Ltd., Rep. By Its Assistant Vice President, A. Ganesh Kumar, Having office at - Consumer Finance Division, No. 34, G N Chetty Road, T Nagar , Chennai 600017.

¶9

Respondent(s)

¶10

For Appellant(s): Ms.Meera Gnanasekar For Respondent(s): Mr.G. Srujith Krishna, Advocate Commissioner

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the vehicle still remains untraceable and therefore, the Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court could not execute the warrant of commission. She seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the application, however, with liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner once again, if

¶13

the vehicle is traceable. Learned counsel for the applicant also submitted that the

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis initial remuneration has already been paid to the Advocate Commissioner.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

vsi

Accordingly, this Application is dismissed as withdrawn and liberty as sought for by the applicant is granted. This Court, while deciding the fresh application to be filed by the applicant seeking for the very same relief shall consider retaining the same Advocate Commissioner, since the applicant has already paid the initial remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner.

17-02-2025

vsi

G Devaraj 1-224, Sikkampatti, Veppilai Muthampatti, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu 635 301.M/s. IndusInd Bank Ltd., Rep. By Its Assistant Vice President, A. Ganesh Kumar, Having office at - Consumer Finance Division, No. 34, G N Chetty Road, T Nagar , Chennai 600017.

¶23

Arb Appln No. 446 of 2024

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s Indusind Bank Ltd. v. G Devaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Indusind Bank Ltd. v. G Devaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Monisha Enterprises Vs The Assistant Commissioner of customs (Refunds-Ii)

The Union of India Vs Cercle De Pondicherry

Sri Nandhanam college of Engineer and Technology Vs The Director General of Shipping

Tata Capital Ltd. Vs Nyju Raj Pm

Tata Capital Ltd. Vs Midhun Unnikrishnan

Annai Infra Developers Limited Vs Engineering Projects India Limited and another