K. Jayalakshmi Rao v. Dasaprakash Paradise, Mysore
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, Appeal (CAD) No.45 of 2024, decided 04.02.2025, K.R.Shriram CJ (author) with Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy J. Consent/compromise disposal: appellants K.Jayalakshmi Rao, K. Gangaprasad, Usha Rao, Kandhi Chandrasekar (counsel Srinath Sridevan Sr./Vishnu Ramu) versus Dasaprakash Paradise Mysore (partnership firm) and others (counsel M.S.Krishnan Sr./P.Giridharan). Appeal sought to set aside judgment and decree dated 09.07.2024 in COS No.1828 of 2022 of District Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai. Parties settled out of court via joint memorandum of compromise dated 04.02.2025 (marked 'X'); respondents 7 and 8 did not sign as non-partners of the first respondent firm. Appeal decreed in terms of the compromise; drawn-up decree dispensed with; statements/undertakings accepted; no costs; CMP No.25342 of 2024 disposed; court fee refund per rules.
What did the court decide?
Appeal decreed in terms of the joint memorandum of compromise dated 04.02.2025; drawn-up decree dispensed with; no order as to costs; CMP No.25342 of 2024 disposed of; refund, if any, of Court fees in accordance with rules.