Application to declare the applicant a major in a pending original petition where he had been represented by his guardian during minority. Court allowed the application on finding the applicant had attained majority.
Applicant declared a major; application allowed as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A No.5633 of 2025
in O.P. No.52 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
A.No.5633 of 2025 in O.P. No.52 of 2019
S. Vedhavarman Applicant/Petitioner Versus 1.S. Kala 2.V. Kanchana 3.S. Maanasha Respondents/Defendants
Prayer : Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules r/w Order XXXII Rule 12 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, prayed to
declare S. Vedhavarman, the applicant herein as major.
For Applicant : M/s. Tamizh Selvi
Page No.1 of 3
A No.5633 of 2025
in O.P. No.52 of 2019
ORDER
The application has been filed to declare the applicant, S. Vedhavarman, as a Major.
applicant/petitioner has attained majority, this application is allowed as prayed for.
02.12.2025 (1/2)
klt
Page No.2 of 3
A No.5633 of 2025 in O.P. No.52 of 2019
P.DHANABAL,J.
klt
A.No.5633 of 2025 in O.P. No.52 of 2019
02.12.2025 (1/2)
Page No.3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant who was a minor when the main petition was filed should be declared a major.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S. Vedhavarman
S. Kala
V. Kanchana
S. Maanasha
P.Dhanabal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
