Allowed¶26
Aravind Laboratories v. Natwarsingh Parbatsingh Chouhan
Madras HCA/5592/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Madras High Court, Commercial Division - leave to file reply statement in trade mark suit (C.S(COMM DIV) No. 82 of 2025); defendant denied use of one impugned label and pleaded publici juris; application allowed subject to confinement of reply to rebuttal of factual allegations in written statement; no costs; Coram: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy J.; decided 15-12-2025.
What did the court decide?
Leave granted to the plaintiff/Applicant to file the Reply Statement in C.S.(Comm. Div.) No. 82 of 2025, confined to refuting the factual allegations made in the written statement; no costs. ¶26