Disposed

M/s National Contracting Company Limited v. M/s.a.v.Forgings

Madras HC10 Mar 2025A/5548/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought permission to pay the Section 19 MSMED Act pre-deposit in instalments before challenging an arbitral award under Section 34. The court allowed payment by a fixed date as a Fixed Deposit favouring the Registrar General, with automatic dismissal if not paid.

What did the court decide?

Permission to pay pre-deposit by 30.04.2025 as Fixed Deposit favouring Registrar General; automatic dismissal of main Section 34 petition on default.

M/s National Contracting Company Limited Vs M/s.a.v.Forgings — Arbitration | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Appln. No.5548 of 2024

¶2

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10.03.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

Appln. No.5548 of 2024 in Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) Dr. No.107594 of 2024

¶7

M/s.National Contracting Company Ltd. Rep. by its Divisional Manager – Operations Sh. Venkatachalam Krithivasan ....

.... Applicant

M/s.A.V. Forgings

..... Respondent

For Applicant : Mr.Kaustubh Sinha

¶13

For Respondent : Ms.Geethi Ara

¶14

for

¶15

M/s.Ramasubramaniam & Associates

¶16

- - - - -

¶17

This application has been filed seeking permission of this Court to

¶18

make the pre-deposit amount as prescribed under Section 19 of the

¶19

MSMED Act by the applicant in instalments.

¶20

In the affidavit filed in support of this application, the applicant

¶21

has undertaken to adhere to the statutory mandate as prescribed under 1/5

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Appln. No.5548 of 2024

¶24

Section 19 of the MSMED Act and show its bonafides by depositing 75% of the award amount, prior to pursuing the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, according to the applicant undue hardship would be caused to them, if the entire predeposit amount is directed to be paid in a single instalment. According to the applicant, it is an entity based in Saudi Arabia and the financing of the subject matter of the project was from a project account, specially and solely set up for a specific purpose, which is the subject matter of the dispute. According to the applicant as per the relevant regulations, the applicant cannot expend any amount from any other account and all expenses in relation to the project are liable to be debited from this project account only, which remain in suspension on account of the completion of the project. The applicant seeks permission for payment

¶25

of the pre-deposit amount in instalments by relying upon a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Tirupati Steels vs. Shubh Industrial Component (2022) 7 SCC 429 , wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has permitted the payment of the pre-deposit amount as mandated under Section 19 of the MSMED Act in instalments, provided the applicant is able to establish hardship for payment of the entire amount in one instalment.

¶26

2/5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Appln. No.5548 of 2024

¶29

3. The learned counsel for the respondent opposes the instant application and would submit that since the applicant is an entity based in South Arabia, they have the means and therefore, the question of payment of instalments does not arise.

¶30

4. However, this Court is satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavit filed in support of this application. This Court has also taken note of the fact that the applicant has raised several grounds in the main Section 34 petition. According to the applicant, the award is patently illegal since based on the Chartered Accountant's certificate, the arbitrator has mechanically accepted the same and has passed the impugned Arbitral Award. This Court deems it fit to direct the applicant to pay the pre-deposit amount as mandated under Section 19 of the MSMED Act on or before 30.04.2025 failing which, the main Section 34 petition seeking to challenge the impugned Arbitral Award shall stand automatically dismissed The pre-deposit amount to be made by the applicant as directed by this Court shall be taken in the form of a Fixed Deposit favouring the Registrar General of this Court for a period of one year which shall be renewed periodically, depending upon the outcome of the main Section 34 petition. On payment of the pre-deposit amount

¶31

3/5

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Appln. No.5548 of 2024

¶34

within the stipulated time, Registry shall number the main O.P., if it is

¶35

otherwise in order .

¶36

5. With the aforesaid directions, this application is disposed of.

10.03.2025

vsi2

4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

Appln. No.5548 of 2024

¶42

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶43

vsi2

¶44

Appln. No.5548 of 2024 in Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) Dr. No.107594 of 2024

¶45

10.03.2025

¶46

5/5

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s National Contracting Company Limited v. M/s.a.v.Forgings

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s National Contracting Company Limited v. M/s.a.v.Forgings

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.L and T Construction Equipment Limited Vs The Assistatnt commissioner of customs (Chennai- Iv)

Vaga Football Club ,Represented by its Secretary S.Chandrakumar Vs Tamilnadu Football Association

The Commissioner of Customs(Chennai Ii) Vs m/s.Sagar Copiers

M/S.Shriram Finance Ltd. Vs Manjula K and another

M/s IndusInd Bank Ltd. Vs Suresh R Rengaraj alias R Suresh

M/S.Mercedes Benz Financial Services India Pvt. .Ltd., Vs Kedia Advisors and Consultants Pvt. Ltd.