Namrata T.Vishwanath and 2 others v. M/S Pee and Dee Lands Holdings (P) Ltd., and 2 others

Madras HC10 Feb 2025A/514/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; A.NO. 514 of 2025; order dated 10-02-2025; application allowed as prayed for; setting aside ex-parte order dated 11.12.2024; defendants 5, 6 and 7; C.S.No.270 of 2022; M/S Pee and Dee Lands Holdings (P) Ltd.; uncontested/consent application, respondents' counsel (Akhil R.Bhansali) raised no objection; short consent-style order, no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Setting aside of the ex-parte order dated 11.12.2024 passed against defendants 5, 6 and 7 in C.S.No.270 of 2022, as prayed for in the application. ¶¶21

Namrata T.Vishwanath and 2 others Vs M/S Pee and Dee Lands Holdings (P) Ltd., and 2 others — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A NO. 514 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶5

A NO. 514 of 2025

¶6

Namrata T.Vishwanath and 2 others D/o Mr.T.S.Viswanath, C-121, Sarvodaya Enclave, South Delhi India 110 017. and 2 Others

¶7

Applicant(s)

¶8

¶9

M/S PEE AND DEE LANDS HOLDINGS (P) LTD., and 2 others Represented By Its Chairman, Mr.N.Palaniswamy, No.82, Cathedral Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai - 86. Mrs.Ragini Rajkumar (deceased) W/o Rajkumar, Bd/6a, Dd Flats, Munrika, New Delhi - 110 017. Mrs.Usha Vishwanath (deceased) W/o T.S.Vishwanath, C-131, Sarvodaya Enclave, New Delhi - 110 017. and 2 Others

¶10

Respondent(s)

¶11

For Applicant(s): M/s.B.Rajkumar Ashok Singh For Respondent(s):

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The present Application has been filed to set aside the ex-parte order passed on 11.12.2024 against the defendants 5, 6 and 7 in C.S.No.270 of 2022.

¶14

Mr.Akhil R.Bhansali, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that he has no

¶15

objection in allowing the present application.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Heard both sides.

¶18

Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application and

¶19

also taking into consideration that the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the

¶20

respective respondents have no objection in allowing the present application and being

¶21

satisfied with the same, the same is ordered as prayed for.

Gba 10-02-2025

(1/2)

M/S PEE AND DEE LANDS HOLDINGS (P) LTD., and 2 others Represented By Its Chairman, Mr.N.Palaniswamy, No.82, Cathedral Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai - 86. Mrs.Ragini Rajkumar (deceased) W/o Rajkumar, Bd/6a, Dd Flats, Munrika, New Delhi - 110 017. Mrs.Usha Vishwanath (deceased)

¶26

W/o T.S.Vishwanath, C-131, Sarvodaya Enclave, New Delhi - 110 017.

¶27

Mr.R.Rajkumar H/o. Of Mrs. Ragini Rajkumar (deceased) Bd/6a, Dd Flats, Munirka, New Delhi110 017.

¶28

Mr.Akshay Rajkumar S/o. Mr.R.Rajkumar, Bd/6a, Dd Flats, Munirka, New Delhi - 110 017.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Namrata T.Vishwanath and 2 others v. M/S Pee and Dee Lands Holdings (P) Ltd., and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Namrata T.Vishwanath and 2 others v. M/S Pee and Dee Lands Holdings (P) Ltd., and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Asif Vs Meraj Fathima and 2 Others

Caroline Kamala Deepa Vs Rosaline Vimal Sheeba Vijayakumar

S.Balasubramanian Vs Sadhana

Mr. G. Natarajan Vs Mr. K. Ananthan

M/s Ramaniyam Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. Vs Gunda Ramani

R.Venugopal Vs Mr.G.Sriramulu