Allowed

Mr.T.Siddharth Jain v. Mr.Akshay Kumar

Madras HC18 Dec 2025A/4178/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Attachment before judgment application in a commercial suit. Notice on the defendant returned unserved with door locked, and the defendant failed to comply with the earlier conditional order to furnish security. The Court allowed the application and ordered attachment of the scheduled property.

What did the court decide?

Attachment before judgment ordered of the property described in the application schedule; matter posted to 29.01.2025.

Mr.T.Siddharth Jain Vs Mr.Akshay Kumar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

A.No.4178 of 2025 in C.S.No.193 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 18-12-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶6

A No. 4178 of 2025 in CS NO. 193 of 2025

¶7

1. Mr.T.Siddharth Jain

¶8

Carrying on Business under the name and style M/S.D.S.Jewellers as its proprietor, Having office at No.342, Mint Street, Bothra Complex, Ground Floor, Shop.No.10, Sowcarpet, Ch-79

Applicant(s)

1. Mr.Akshay Kumar

is carrying on business under the name and style M/S.Shubh Ornaments as its proprietor Having Office at No.129/40, N.S.C.Bose Road, Shop No.8, Sowcarpet, Ch-1

¶13

Respondent(s)

¶14

CS No. 193 of 2025

¶15

1. Mr.T.Siddharth Jain

¶16

Carrying on Business under the name and style M/S.D.S.Jewellers as its proprietor, Having office at No.342, Mint Street, Bothra Complex, Ground Floor, Shop.No.10, Sowcarpet, Ch-79

Plaintiff(s)

1/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

A.No.4178 of 2025 in C.S.No.193 of 2025

¶22

1. Mr.Akshay Kumar

¶23

is carrying on business under the name and style M/S.Shubh Ornaments as its proprietor Having Office at No.129/40, N.S.C.Bose Road, Shop No.8, Sowcarpet, Ch-1

¶24

Defendant(s)

¶25

A No. 4178 of 2025 For Applicant(s): M/s.T.Srikanth T.Shrinikethan-ms/1748/2017 Mob-9003096127 For Respondent(s): Sole Respondent - Set Exparte On 05.11.2025 Cn - Unserved (door Locked)

¶26

ORDER

¶27

This application has been filed by the applicant to order attachment before

¶28

judgment of the property belonging to the respondents / defendants herein, morefully described in the schedule.

¶29

A perusal of the records shows that the notice returned as door locked. Already, this Court directed the respondent to furnish security and conditional order has not been complied. Therefore, this application is allowed and the property mentioned in the application are ordered to be attached.

¶30

Post the matter on 29.01.2025.

18.12.2025 (1/2)

mtl

2/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

A.No.4178 of 2025 in C.S.No.193 of 2025

¶36

P.DHANABAL, J.

¶37

mtl

¶38

A No. 4178 of 2025 in CS NO. 193 o f 2025

¶39

18.12.2025

¶40

3/3

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mr.T.Siddharth Jain v. Mr.Akshay Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.T.Siddharth Jain v. Mr.Akshay Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.P.R.K.B.Ernest and another Vs Chitralekha and 2 others

R.Selvakumar Vs Kailash Colony Welfare Associations

N.Rajendran (Decd) Vs Lakshmi

M.S.Krishna Prasad Vs R.Rajalakshmi and another

D.Balamani and 9 others Vs a.Suseela and 2 others

S.Gul Mohamed Vs I.Abu Huraia and 2 Others