Raghavan v. Mrs.Janaki
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for condonation of delay in filing a written statement approved due to the respondent's unopposed endorsement, dismissing the respondents' objections and allowing the application under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 151 CPC.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of delay of 219 days in filing the written statement in T.O.S. No. 41 of 2024 allowed.
What the court decided
A.No. 3933 of 2025 in T.O.S. No. 41 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.08.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
A.No. 3933 of 2025 in T.O.S. No. 41 of 2024
1.R.Raghavan 2.R.Soundararajan 3.R.Rajagopal 4.R.Parthasarathy
- 5.Bhama Venkatesh
- 6.Vijaya 7.Raghavan
- 8.Keerthivasan
- 9.Krithika ...Applicants
Vs.
1.Janaki 2.V.R.Rajagopalan
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay in filing a written statement is warranted when the respondent has no objection.
Whether the application under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 151 CPC should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
R. Raghavan
- applicant
R. Soundararajan
- applicant
R. Rajagopal
- applicant
R. Parthasarathy
- applicant
Bhama Venkatesh
- applicant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court