Allowed¶7
Raghu Ganapathy v. Thara Rajendran and another
Madras HCA/347/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Madras High Court, K. Kumaresh Babu J., 03.02.2025 — A.No.347 of 2025 in C.S.No.219 of 2022: condonation of 69 days' delay in filing reply statement vide D.No.49816 of 2024; application allowed as prayed for; first respondent's counsel (Sidharth Shiva Kumar) gave no objection. No statutes or precedent cases cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 69 days in filing the reply statement filed vide D.No.49816 of 2024 in C.S.No.219 of 2022 condoned. ¶7