Ringfeder Power Transmission India Private Limited, v. Rajesh mootha

Madras HC2 Jul 2025A/2958/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court order extending the mandate of a sole arbitrator under Section 29A (4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Order XIV and Rule 8 of O.S. Rules. Applicant: Ringfeder Power Transmission India Private Limited; Respondent: Rajesh Mootha. Dispute arose out of Built Suit Facility Agreement dated 29.04.2021. Two-month extension granted upon showing of sufficient cause, with the respondent raising no objection. Search terms: extension of time, arbitral tribunal, pronouncement of arbitral award, sufficient cause, A No. 2958 of 2025, Abdul Quddhose.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce the arbitral award by another period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. ¶24-26

Ringfeder Power Transmission India Private Limited, Vs Rajesh… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

A No. 2958 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02-07-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

A No. 2958 of 2025

¶7

Ringfeder Power Transmission India Private Limited, rep by its Managing director Mr.Dheepan Ramalingam Falcon Heights, 4th Floor, Plot No. 30, Industrial Estate, Perungudi Chennai-600 096.

¶8

Applicant(s)

¶9

¶10

Rajesh Mootha 555, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai-600016.

¶11

Respondent(s)

¶12

PRAYER

¶13

Application filed under Order XIV and Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Section 29A (4) & (5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to extend the mandate of the Learned Sole Arbitrator concerning the subject matter dispute arising out of Built Suit Facility Agreement dated 29.04.2021, by a further period of two months or such further time as this Court may deem fit.

¶14

For Applicant(s): M/s.C.Suraj A.Ashwinkumar V. Vigneswar For Respondent: Mr.R.Pavesh

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

A No. 2958 of 2025

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The learned counsel for the respondent has stated no objection for

¶20

allowing this application.

¶21

2.This application has been filed seeking extension of time for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce the Arbitral Award by another period of two months.

¶22

3.This Court is also satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavit

¶23

filed in support of this application as sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for seeking extension of time. Accordingly, this application is allowed

¶24

as prayed for and time is extended for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce the

¶25

Aribtral Award by another period of two months from the date of receipt of a

copy of this order.

02-07-2025

Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No