Allowed¶9
C.S.Balakrishnan (Deceased) 1.K.MUTHU v. T.Amudan Antony (Decd.) 1.K.DEVI
Madras HCA/2937/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Interlocutory application allowed by Madras High Court (C.V. Karthikeyan, J.) on 22.07.2025 in A.No.2937 of 2025 in C.S.No.600 of 2011 permitting introduction of an Advocate Commissioner's report from A.S.No.380 of 2006 (appointment order I.A.No.950 of 2007 dated 12.07.2007, VII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai); objections of delay and irrelevance answered on the ground that relevancy is examined only after production and marking of the document; marking permitted subject to relevancy, proof and genuinity.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to introduce the copy of the report of the Advocate Commissioner appointed in A.S.No.380 of 2006; it may be marked as evidence during the course of trial, subject to relevancy, proof and genuinity. ¶9