Allowed¶23

A.Vishnu v. N.Shruthi

Madras HC7 Jul 2025A/2919/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court interlocutory order dated 07-07-2025 (K. Kumaresh Babu, J.) in A.No.2919 of 2025 in O.P.No.241 of 2025 and A.No.2095 of 2025, allowing recall/reopening of A.No.2094 of 2025 relating to temporary custody of a minor son and welfare of the minor; earlier order dated 09.05.2025 was a temporary measure with counters directed; main OP listed with applications on 23.07.2025 for filing counter. Parties: A.Vishnu (applicant) v. N.Shruthi (respondent); counsel M/s.J.Ravikumar and Mr.P.Arul Gnana Prakash. No statutes or precedents cited; no monetary amounts.

What did the court decide?

Application in A.No.2094 of 2025 in O.P.No.241 of 2025 recalled (reopened); the main Original Petition to be listed along with the applications on 23.07.2025 'for filing counter'. ¶23

A.Vishnu Vs N.Shruthi — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A NO. 2919 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-07-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶5

A NO. 2919 of 2025 in OP NO. 241 OF 2025

¶6

and

¶7

A NO. 2095 OF 2025

¶8

A.Vishnu

¶9

S/o.B.Anantharamakrishnan, No.62, Jayam Illam, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Maduvinkarai, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

Applicant(s)

N.Shruthi

D/o.S.Narayanan, No.53 and 55, Flat No.3C, The Point Apartment, Five Furlong Road, Maduvinkarai, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. also at No.9/1C, 1st Floor, Burkit Road, T.Nagar, Thiyagaraya Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

¶14

Respondent(s)

¶15

For Applicant(s): M/s.J.Ravikumar

¶16

For Respondent(s):

¶17

Mr.P.Arul Gnana Prakash

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This application has been filed to reopen application in A.No.2094 of 2025 in O.P.No.241 of 2025 and hear the same on merits.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 09.05.2025 was passed by way of a temporary measure without going into the merits of the application and as a matter of fact, the respondent was directed to file counters in the applications and the OP in the meantime. He further submitted that the closure of the application will defeat the rights of the petitioner to seek temporary custody of his minor son and affect the welfare of the minor. Therefore, he submits that the application in A.No.2094 of 2025 in O.P.No.241 of 2025 may be reopened.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Having satisfied with the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the application in A.No.2094 of 2025 in O.P.No.241 of 2025 is recalled.

¶23