Allowed¶21
The Chief Commissioner II v. Arulmigu Bashya Kara Adi Chenna Kesava Perumal Temple
Madras HCA/2129/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Madras High Court order 25.04.2025; A.No.2129 of 2025 in C.S.No.246 of 2006 / C.S.Nos.292 of 2005 & 11 of 2006; setting aside ex parte order dated 17.02.2003 against second defendant (Income Tax Department); sufficient cause shown; delay due to changes in dealing officers; no objection by plaintiff; Registry to number and list application to condone delay in filing written statement; next listing 13.06.2025; Judge Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy.
What did the court decide?
Ex parte order dated 17.02.2003 against the second defendant set aside; Registry directed to number and list the application to condone delay in filing the written statement; matter listed on 13.06.2025. ¶21