Disposed

Selvakumar C v. The State Government

Madras HC19 Jul 2024WP(MD)/9181/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought revocation of sanitary works and toilet maintenance contracts from private parties and organising Corporation scavengers into self-help groups. Counsel restricted relief to consideration of the petitioner's representation; the court directed the Madurai Corporation Commissioner to decide it within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to third respondent to consider representation dated 04.03.2024 and pass orders on merits within twelve weeks.

Selvakumar C Vs The State Government — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.9181 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR .D.KRISHNAKUMAR , ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.9181 of 2024

¶7

C.Selvakumar ... Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

1.The State Government rep.by its Secretary Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department St.George Fort Chennai-600 009

¶10

2.The State Government rep.by its Secretary Special Programme Implementation St.George Fort Chennai-600 009

¶11

3.The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Madurai-625 002 ... Respondents

¶12

____________ Page 1 of 6

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.(MD) No.9181 of 2024

¶15

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to revoke the contracts of sanitary works and public toilet maintaining from the individual persons and private organizations and to direct the second respondent to execute the special development programme to organize the scavengers who is working for Madurai Corporation as daily wager into self-help groups and assist them to take part in contracts of sanitary works and public toilet maintaining in Madurai Corporation through self-help works and establish the economic equality among people based on the petitioner's representation dated 04.03.2024.

¶16

[Amended vide Court order dated 04.06.2024 in W.M.P.(MD) No.8705 of 2024]

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Murugesan For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilakkumar Government Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.S.Vinayak Standing Counsel for R3

¶18

Page 2 of 6

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD) No.9181 of 2024

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE]

¶23

Prayer in this writ petition is to direct the first respondent to revoke the contract of sanitary works and public toilet maintaining works from the individual persons and private organizations and to direct the second respondent to execute the special development programme to organize the scavengers, who are working for Madurai Corporation as daily wagers into self-help groups and assist them to take part in the contract of sanitary works and public toilet maintaining in Madurai Corporation through self-help works and establish the economic equality among people based on the petitioner's representation dated 04.03.2024.

¶24

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice if a direction is given to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.03.2024 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law.

¶25

Page 3 of 6

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD) No.9181 of 2024

¶28

3. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the third respondent have no objection for the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶29

4. Taking into consideration the limited scope of the relief sought for by the petitioner, without going into the merits of the matter, we direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.03.2024 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity to the parties concerned. Such an exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶31

[D.K.K., A.C.J.] [R.V., J.] 19.07.2024

¶32

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶33

krk

¶34

____________ Page 4 of 6

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.(MD) No.9181 of 2024

¶37

To:

¶38

1.The Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, State Government, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009.

¶39

2.The Secretary, State Government, Special Programme Implementation, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009.

¶40

Page 5 of 6

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P.(MD) No.9181 of 2024

¶43

D.KRISHNAKUMAR , A.C.J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

¶44

krk

¶45

W.P.(MD) No.9181 of 2024

¶46

19.07.2024

¶47

____________ Page 6 of 6

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Selvakumar C v. The State Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Selvakumar C v. The State Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rukmani Vs The District Collector

M.Saravanakumar Vs The Commmissionerate of Prohibition and Excise Department

E.S.Sahayam @ E. Iyappan Vs The Director