Mamundi v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking removal of encroachment and disconnection of electricity. The court found the encroachment had already been removed, rendering the prayer infructuous and closing the petition.
What did the court decide?
The prayer sought in the Writ Petition stands infructuous and the Writ Petition stands closed; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.902 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.12.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE
W.P.(MD).No.902 of 2020
Mamundi
... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
- 2.The Superintendent Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Pudukkottai.
- 3.The Tahsildar, Iluppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
- 4.The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Viralimalai Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer to remove encroachment and disconnect electricity was still maintainable when the encroachment had already been removed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mamundi
- respondent
Renga Konar
- respondent
Palaniyandi Konar
- respondent
The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai
- respondent
The Superintendent Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Pudukkottai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court