Writ petition seeking a mandamus to survey vacant land in Kavinadu West Village was dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the petitioner stated the prayer had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.8972 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P(MD)No.8972 of 2023
Santhi
...Petitioner
Vs.
...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to survey the vacant land bearing S.No.331/7 having extent 20 cents with respective patta No.2693 situated at Kavinadu West Village, Pudukkottai Taluk and District by considering the petitioner representation dated 21.03.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arul Jenifer For R3 : Mr.R.Ragavendran Government Advocate
1/3
WP(MD)No.8972 of 2023
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that
the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.
infructuous. No costs.
27.11.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No CM
To
The Tahsildar, Pudukkottai Taluk, Pudukkottai.
2/3
WP(MD)No.8972 of 2023
N.MALA,J.
am
W.P(MD)No.8972 of 2023
27.11.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santhi
The Assistant District Surveyor, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District
The Head Surveyor, Pudukkottai Taluk, Pudukkottai
The Tahsildar, Pudukkottai Taluk, Pudukkottai
N.Mala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
