Allowed

Jesikala, v. the District Registrar

Madras HC24 Oct 2024WP(MD)/8705/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three siblings challenged the registered unilateral cancellation of their mother's settlement deeds by the Sub Registrar, Valliyoor. Relying on the Madras High Court Full Bench decision in Sasikala holding unilateral cancellation of conveyances void ab initio, the Court set aside the three cancellation deeds of 12.09.2013 and allowed the writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

Cancellation deeds Doc.Nos.3076, 3077 and 3078 of 2013 dated 12.09.2013 registered by the Sub Registrar, Valliyoor were set aside; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Jesikala, Vs the District Registrar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 24.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD).Nos.6768, 6769 of 2019, 20566 and 20800 of 2024

¶8

W.P(MD).No.8705 of 2024

Jesikala

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Registrar, Registration Department, Tirunelveli District.

¶13

2.The Sub Registrar, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.

¶14

3.Lalithabai

¶15

4.Y.Muthiah

¶16

5.M.Raja Jesudoss

¶17

6.Evangelin Geetha

¶18

... Respondents

¶19

(R4 to 6 are impleaded vide Court order dated 24.10.2024 in W.M.P(MD).No.15898 of 2022 in W.P(MD).No.8705 of 2019)

¶20

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Page No.1/8

¶23

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024

¶24

records relating to the impugned order of unilateral cancellation of the settlement deed Doc.No.3076/2013 dated 12.09.2013 by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr.V.P.Rajan

¶26

For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh (for R1& R2) Government Advocate Mr.P.Ganapathi (for R3) Mr.H.Arumugam (for R4 to R6)

¶27

W.P(MD).No.20566 of 2024 Evangelin Geetha

¶28

... Petitioner

¶29

Vs.

¶30

1.The Sub Registrar, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.

¶31

2.Y.Muthiah 3.Raja Jesudhas 4.Jesikala

¶32

... Respondents

¶33

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned registration of unilateral cancellation of settlement deed in Doc.No.3077/2013 dated 12.09.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to make entry of encumbrance regarding the same in Book No.1 of his office.

¶34

For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Rishikesh

¶35

Page No.2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024

¶37

For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh (for R1) Government Advocate

¶38

W.P(MD).No.24474 of 2024

Raja Jesudhas

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Sub Registrar, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.

¶43

2.Y.Muthiah 3.Evangelin Geetha 4.Jesikala ... Respondents

¶44

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned registration of unilateral cancellation of settlement deed in Doc.No.3078/2013 dated 12.09.2013 and quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to make entry of encumbrance regarding the same in Book No.1 of his office.

¶45

For Petitioner : Mr.P.P.Alwin Balan For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh (for R1) Government Advocate

¶46

COMMON ORDER

¶47

These writ petitions have been filed against the unilateral cancelation of the settlement deed executed by one Lalithabai, who is the mother of the petitioners herein.

¶48

Page No.3/8

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024

¶51

The case of the petitioners is that their mother executed a

¶52

settlement deed vide Doc Nos.6128, 6129 and 6130 of 2011 on the file of the second respondent in respect of the subject property. Thereafter, she has unilaterally cancelled the same on 12.09.2013 by registering the cancellation deed vide Doc.Nos.3076, 3077 and 3078 of 2013. Challenging the same, these writ petitions have been filed.

¶53

Heard both sides.

¶54

At the outset, this Court is of the view that unilateral

¶55

cancellation of the settlement by executing a cancellation deed is not permissible under law and it is void ab initio. Further, the Full Bench of this court in a decision in Sasikala vs. Revenue Divisional Officer cum

¶56

Sub Collector and another made in W.P.(MD).Nos.6889 of 2020 etc., batch cases dated 02.09.2022 has held as follows :

¶57

“ 44. From the discussions and conclusions we have reached above with reference to various provisions of Statutes and precedents, we reiterate the dictum of Hon-ble Supreme Court in Thota Ganga Laxmi and Ors. vs.Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors., reported in (2010) 15 SCC 207 and the Full Bench of this Court in Latif Estate Line India Ltd., case,

¶58

Page No.4/8

¶59

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶60

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024

¶61

reported in AIR 2011(Mad) 66 and inclined to follow the judgment of three member Bench of Hon-ble Supreme Court in Veena Singh's case reported in (2022) 7 SCC 1 and the judgment of two member Bench of Hon-ble Supreme Court in Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd., case, reported in 2022 SCC On-line SC 544 for the following propositions:

¶62

(a) A sale deed or a deed of conveyance other than testamentary dispositions which is executed and registered cannot be unilaterally cancelled.

¶63

(b) Such unilateral cancellation of sale deed or a deed of conveyance is wholly void and non est and does not operate to execute, assign, limit or extinguish any right, title or interest in the property.

¶64

(c) Such unilateral cancellation of sale deed or deed of conveyance cannot be accepted for registration.

¶65

(d) The transferee or any one claiming under him or her need not approach the civil Court and a Writ Petition is maintainable to challenge or nullify the registration.

¶66

(e) However, an absolute deed of sale or deed of conveyance which is duly executed by the transferor may be cancelled by the Civil Court at the instance of transferor as contemplated under Section 31 of Specific Relief Act.

¶67

(f) As regards gift or settlement deed, a deed of revocation or cancellation is permissible only in a case which fall under Section 126 of Transfer of Property Act, and the Registering Authority can accept the deed of cancellation of gift for registration subject to the conditions specified in para

¶68

Page No.5/8

¶69

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶70

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024

¶71

42 of this judgment.

¶72

(g)The legal principles above stated by us cannot be applied to cancellation of Wills or power of Attorney deed which are revocable and not coupled with interest.?”

¶73

5. In view of the above settled provision of law, unilateral cancellation of the settlement deed is not valid in the eye of law. Hence, the unilateral cancellation of the settlement deed is liable to be set aside.

¶74

6. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are allowed and the unilateral cancellation of the Settlement Deeds in Doc.Nos.3076, 3077 and 3078 of 2013, dated 12.09.2013, on the file of the Sub Registrar, Valliyoor, is hereby set aside. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶75

24.10.2024 (2/5)

¶76

Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Rmk

¶77

Page No.6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶78

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024

¶79

¶80

1.The District Registrar, Registration Department, Tirunelveli District.

¶81

2.The Sub Registrar, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.

¶82

Page No.7/8

¶83

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶84

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024

¶85

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶86

Rmk

¶87

W.P.(MD)Nos.8705 of 2019, 24301 and 24474 of 2024

¶88

24.10.2024 (2/5)

¶89

Page No.8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Jesikala, v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jesikala, v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvam Vs The District Collector

N.D. Chandra Mouli Vs The District Registrar

S. Sudhakar Vs The District Collector

Sankaran. N Vs The District Registrar

Siddarth C S Vs The Director

Sp.Vairavan Vs The Sub Registrar, Joint I