Dismissed

B.Ravi, the Government v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC4 Jan 2024WP(MD)/7588/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging a Government Order requiring shop vacating. The court found the petition infructuous because a subsequent Government Order dated 21.06.2022 addressed the matter.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

B.Ravi, the Government Vs the Government of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.7588 of 2015

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 04.01.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P(MD)No.7588 of 2015 MP(MD) Nos.2 & 3 of 2015 WMP(MD) No.3941 of 2021

¶7

1.B.Ravi 2.S.Paulraj 3.S.Alagar 4.L.Padmini

5.G.Muthuramanujam

6.S.Subbiah

7.S.Vellaisamy

8.Nangiah

9.R.Mohan

10.K.Rajagopal 11.M.Naggor Meeran 12.S.Selvarani 13.National Association of Education Self Employed Youth Ref.222/76 Rep by the General Secretary, S.Ganesh Bose ... Petitioners

¶14

¶15

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/5

¶18

W.P(MD)No.7588 of 2015

¶19

2.The Director of Medical Education, Chennai 5.

¶20

3.The Director of Medical Service and Family Welfare, Chennai 6.

¶21

4.The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai.

¶22

...Respondents

¶23

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned G.O.MS.93 Health and Family Welfare(H2) Department dated 25.03.2015 on the file of the Respondent No.1 and quash the same as illegal.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents : Mr.Veerakathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.R.Sureshkumar Additional Government Pleader

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

This writ petition is filed challenging the Government

¶27

order issued in G.O.MS.93 Health and Family Welfare(H2) Department dated 25.03.2015, in and by which, a direction was

¶28

2/5

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P(MD)No.7588 of 2015

¶31

issued to the petitioners to vacate their shops from the premises of Medical College Hospitals in Tamil Nadu.

¶32

2.Today(04.01.2024), when this writ petition is taken up

¶33

for hearing, the learned counsel on either side submits that this writ petition has become infructuous, in view of the Government Order issued in G.O.(Ms.No.)194, Public Health and Welfare Department, dated 21.06.2022 and a copy of the Government order has also been produced before this Court.

¶34

3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel

¶35

on either side, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶36

04.01.2024

¶37

NCC: Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn

¶38

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P(MD)No.7588 of 2015

¶40

¶41

1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai.

¶42

2.The Director of Medical Education, Chennai 5.

¶43

3.The Director of Medical Service and Family Welfare, Chennai 6.

¶44

4.The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai.

¶45

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P(MD)No.7588 of 2015

¶47

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶48

vrn

¶49

Order made in W.P(MD)No.7588 of 2015 MP(MD) Nos.2 & 3 of 2015 WMP(MD) No.3941 of 2021

¶50

04.01.2024

¶51

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

B.Ravi, the Government v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Ravi, the Government v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Marichamy Vs the Assistant/

Pugalendhi.R Vs The Commissioner

Kadar Musafar Vs The Chief Executive Officer

Kumaravel v Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Sankarammal Vs the Joint Commissioner

The Oriental Insurance Company Vs District Legal Services