Disposed

S Srinivasagam v. The Commissioner

Madras HC10 Jan 2024WP(MD)/623/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a property tax demand notice issued by Madurai Corporation and seeking a sanitary certificate for school premises. The Corporation's standing counsel submitted that the entire tax arrears had been settled by the petitioner. Recording this submission, the Court closed the writ petition with no costs.

What did the court decide?

None granted; writ petition closed on recording that tax arrears were settled.

S Srinivasagam Vs The Commissioner — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.623 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 10.01.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P(MD)No.623 of 2024 WMP(MD) Nos.632,634 & 636 of 2024

¶7

S Srinivasagam ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai 20.

¶10

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Zone 1, Anaiyur Road, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

¶11

3.The City Health Officer, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. ...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned demand notice, which was issued by the Revenue Assistant on the file of the 1st respondent dated 15.12.2023 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P(MD)No.623 of 2024

¶16

consequently to direct the respondents to issue Sanitary Certificate for the purpose of smooth functioning of school in the premises of the petitioner based on the petitioner representation dated 22.12.2023 within a time stipulated by this Court.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Srinivasagam For Respondents : Mr.K.K.Kannan Standing Counsel

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This writ petition is filed as against the demand notice,

¶20

dated 15.12.2023 issued by the Commissioner, Madurai Corporation.

¶21

2.Today(10.01.2024), when this writ petition is taken up

¶22

for admission, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that the entire tax arrears has been settled by the petitioner and as on date, there is no arrears of tax due

¶23

from him.

¶24

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P(MD)No.623 of 2024

¶26

3.Recording the submission made on behalf of the respondent Corporation, this Writ Petition is closed. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.

¶27

10.01.2024

¶28

NCC: Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn To

¶29

1.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai 20.

¶30

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Zone 1, Anaiyur Road, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

¶31

3.The City Health Officer, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

¶32

3/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P(MD)No.623 of 2024

¶35

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶36

vrn

¶37

Order made in W.P(MD)No.623 of 2024 WMP(MD) Nos.632,634 & 636 of 2024

¶38

10.01.2024

¶39

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S Srinivasagam v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S Srinivasagam v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanan.S Vs The Commissioner

Sundar Srinivasan R Vs The Commissioner

Jaheeir Hussain I Vs The Chief Executive Officer

Esakki Vs The Commissioner

M.Khadhar Moideen, Vs the District Revenue Officer

S.Thiraviyam, S/O.Subramanian Vs the Executive Engineer