Writ petition challenging revenue orders was dismissed as infructuous upon the petitioner's counsel submitting that the prayer had become moot. No costs were imposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.61 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 14.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.(MD)No.61 of 2023
A.Adhivalavan
... Petitioner
Vs.
3.J.Santhi Devi ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st respondent to dispose the petition, dated 30.07.2021 against the order passed by the 2 nd respondent in Ni.Mu.No.5261/2021/G5, dated 10.03.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.S.Manohar
1/3
W.P.(MD)No.61 of 2023
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
14.11.2024
NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no
gbg
To:
2/3
W.P.(MD)No.61 of 2023
N.MALA, J.
gbg
W.P.(MD)No.61 of 2023
14.11.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Adhivalavan
The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai
The District Revenue Officer, Madurai Collector's Office, Madurai
J.Santhi Devi
N.Mala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
