Disposed

Kasipandian .R v. The District Collector

Madras HC8 Mar 2024WP(MD)/5681/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought sanitary certificate for cinema licence renewal. Respondent demanded property tax arrears as precondition. Court directed petitioner to submit receipts and ordered respondent to verify and decide within one week.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to submit documents by 12.03.2024; direction to second respondent to consider documents and pass order within one week.

Kasipandian .R Vs The District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 08.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024 and WMP(MD) No.5377 of 2024

Kasipandian .R

... Petitioner

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Kokkirakulam Road, Tirunelveli-627 009.

¶11

2.The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Tirunelveli, Corporation Office, SN High Road, Tirunelveli. Respondents

¶12

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No. A4 2407 2022 dated 27.06.2023 and quash the same consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue sanitary certificate for the property Ram Theatre at 9A2, Madurai Road,

¶13

1/8

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024

¶16

Tirunelveli -627001 on the basis of petitioners application dated 07.02.2024 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Pon Senthil Kumaran For R1 : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Standing Counsel

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

The petitioner is running a Cinema Theatre in the name of ''Ram Theatre'' at 9A2, Madurai Road, Tirunelveli Junction, Tirunelveli and he was issued with C Form Licence in the year 1999. The licence issued to the petitioner has been periodically renewed under Section 92 of the Tamil Nadu Cinema (Regulation) Act, 1957 with all mandatory requirements, including the safety insurance and sanitary certificate by the Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation. The C Form license issued to the petitioner is expired on 09.02.2024. In order to renew the licence, the petitioner has applied for a sanitary certificate from the second respondent on 07.02.2024. On receipt of a request for the sanitary certificate from the petitioner, the second respondent has issued a notice calling upon this petitioner

¶20

2/8

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024

¶23

to pay a sum of Rs.32,23,235/- as property tax arrears payable by the petitioner for the years 1999-2000 to 2022-2023. Therefore, the petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the notice, dated 27.06.2023 on the ground that this petitioner is not having any arrears of property tax. The petitioner claims that he is having all the receipts for the payment made by the petitioner towards property tax. However, without providing any opportunity to the petitioner, the respondents have fixed the arrears of property tax as Rs.32,23,235/- and also called upon the petitioner to pay the said amount as a condition for issuing the sanitary certificate, which is required for the renewal of C Form licence. Therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court.

¶24

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is paying the property tax regularly. He further submits that the second respondent has denied to accept the demand draft for Rs.12,66,824/- offered by the petitioner towards property tax for the year 2023-2024. By the order impugned in this

¶25

3/8

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024

¶28

writ petition, the second respondent has directed the petitioner to pay the property tax for the year 2023-2024 along with the arrears of Rs.32,12,235/-. He further submits that the petitioner's licence has already been expired on 09.02.2024 and the petitioner is running his theater with E Form licence. In order to renew the C Form licence, he has to produce the sanitary certificate to the authorities on or before 13.03.2024. Therefore, the learned counsel has insisted for early disposal of the application, which is pending before the second respondent.

¶29

3.Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government

¶30

Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.S.P.Maharajan,

¶31

learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the second respondent.

¶32

4.The learned standing counsel appearing for the second respondent submits that it is only a show cause notice calling upon

¶33

the petitioner to pay the arrears of property tax. If the petitioner is having receipts for payment of property tax made by him, he can

¶34

4/8

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024

¶37

very well produce the same before the authorities and the same would be considered within a reasonable time.

¶38

5.This Court considered the rival submissions made and

¶39

also perused the materials placed on record.

¶40

6.When the petitioner has made a request for sanitary certificate, which is required for him for the purpose of renewing the C Form licence for running his theater, the second respondent all of a sudden has raised a demand of Rs.32,23,235/- as if there is an arrears of property tax from the year 1999. It appears that the second respondent has not raised the demand so far and it is only on his request for the sanitary certificate, this demand has been made. The petitioner claims that he has paid the property tax without any fail and he is also having the receipts for the same.

¶41

7.Since the petitioner claims that he is having the receipts for the payment of property tax, this writ petition is

¶42

5/8

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024

¶45

disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the second respondent on 12.03.2024 along with the required documents. On receipt of such documents, the second respondent shall consider the same and pass an order within a period of one week from thereon. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶46

08.03.2024

¶47

NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn

¶48

Note: Issue order copy today (08.03.2024)

¶49

6/8

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024

¶52

¶53

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Kokkirakulam Road, Tirunelveli-627 009.

¶54

2.The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Tirunelveli, Corporation Office, SN High Road, Tirunelveli.

¶55

7/8

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024

¶58

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶59

vrn

¶60

Order made in W.P(MD)No.5681 of 2024 and WMP(MD) No.5377 of 2024

¶61

08.03.2024

¶62

8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Kasipandian .R v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kasipandian .R v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Beach Minerals (Sands) Company, Vs the Union of India

Sivaraman Vs The District Collector

Chandrasekar.v Vs The Commissioner

Kaviyarajan Vs The District Collector

Samidurai Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

M/s. Solayappa Bus Lines Vs The Regional Transport Authority