Dismissed

Mohan @ Mohanasundaram v. The District Collector

Madras HC5 Mar 2024WP(MD)/5109/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking direction to authorities to enquire into his claim as a hereditary trustee of a temple and restrain the reigning trustee from conducting a festival. The High Court dismissed the writ, holding the petitioner has an effective remedy pending before the Joint Commissioner and no alternative writ lies.

What did the court decide?

The High Court did not grant the relief sought; the writ petition was dismissed and no costs awarded.

Mohan @ Mohanasundaram Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 05.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶7

Mohan @ Mohanasundram ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The District Collector, Collectorate Campus,

¶10

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srivilliputhur Road, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District – 626 123

¶11

3.The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District – 626 125

¶12

4.The Joint Commissioner, Office of Joint & Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Ellis Nagar, Madurai- 625 016

¶13

5.The District Superintendent of Police, District Collectorate, Virudhunagr – 625 002

¶14

The Inspector of Police,

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

¶17

W.P(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶18

Srivilliputhur Town Police Station, Srivilliputhur – 626 125

¶19

The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Virudhunagar District

¶20

8.T.Selvaraj

¶21

9.S.Senthil Kumar 10.S.Santhi 11.S.Lakshmi 12.S.Meenatchi

¶22

....Respondents

¶23

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1 to 4^th respondents to conduct enquiry and to forbear the 8^th respondent and his allies from conducting the Massi festival coming on 10.03.2024 11.03.2024 till the disposal of OA NO.14/2024 on the file of the 4^th respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 23.02.2024, within the stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sakthi Rao For R1 to R4 & R7 : Mr. P.Subbaraj Special Government Advocate For R5 & R6 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanidhi

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of writ of

¶27

mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct enquiry and

¶28

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶31

to forbear the 8^th respondent and his allies from conducting the Maasi festival coming on 10.03.2024 and 11.03.2024 till the disposal of OA NO.14/2024 on the file of the 4^th respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 23.02.2024.

¶32

2. The petitioner claims that he is a legal heir of the previous Trustee in Arulmigu Draupadi Amman Temple @ Dharmar Temple situated in Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. This temple, according to the petitioner, was established by his grand father one Sangiah Thevar 142 years ago and after the demise of Sangiah Thever, the petitioner's father Ramasundaram @ Sethupandiyan managed the temple as a hereditary Trustee. Ramasundaram @ Sethupandiyan is having six legal heirs namely Tamilselvi, Santhi, Lakshmi, Meenakshi, the petitioner and his brother Senthil Kumar. The petitioner's father died on 12.12.2011. Thereafter, the petitioner has approached the respondent to permit him to function as hereditary Trustee. However, the same has not

¶33

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶36

been considered. Therefore, the petitioner has filed Original Application before the Joint Commissioner in O.A.No.14 of 2024 to declare him as hereditary Trustee of the said temple. The same is pending. In the meantime, the 8^th respondent claims to be the hereditary Trustee and taking steps to conduct Maasi festival on 10.03.2024 and 11.03.2024. Therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to forbear the 8^th respondent to conduct Maasi festival on 10.03.2024 and 11.03.2024 till the disposal of O.A.NO.14 of 2024 dated 23.02.2024.

¶37

3. Mr.P.Subba Raj, learned Special Government Pleader

¶38

takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4 and 7 and submits that the 8^th respondent was already declared as hereditary Trustee in M.P.No.47 of 2019 dated 30.01.2020. He further submits that O.A.No.14 of 2024 was filed by the petitioner only in the year 2024 and the same is pending before the Joint Commissioner.

¶39

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶42

4. This Court gave its anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and 7 and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 5 and 6 and perused the materials available on record.

¶43

5. According to the petitioner, he is not even aware that the 8^th respondent has already been declared as hereditary Trustee and there cannot be any order in favour of the 8^th respondent, without providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner has approached this Court for forbearing the 8^th respondent from conducting the festival on 10.03.2024 and 11.03.2024. It is represented by the learned Special Government Pleader that the 8^th respondent was already declared as hereditary Trustee. The petitioner has also filed O.A.No.14 of 2024 to declare him as hereditary Trustee and the same is still pending.

¶44

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶47

6. In these circumstances, the petitioner can work out his

¶48

remedy before the Joint Commissioner in O.A.No.14 of 2024, which

¶49

is still pending.

¶50

7. This Court is not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition

¶51

and the same is dismissed. No costs.

¶52

05.03.2024

¶53

Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM

¶54

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

W.P(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶57

To,

¶58

The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Virudhunagar -626 002

¶59

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srivilliputhur Road, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District – 626 123

¶60

3.The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District – 626 125

¶61

4.The Joint Commissioner, Office of Joint & Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Ellis Nagar, Madurai- 625 016

¶62

5.The District Superintendent of Police, District Collectorate, Virudhunagr – 625 002

¶63

The Inspector of Police, Srivilliputhur Town Police Station, Srivilliputhur – 626 125

¶64

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶65

¶66

W.P(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶67

The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Virudhunagar District

¶68

¶69

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶70

W.P(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶71

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶72

¶73

W.P.(MD)No.5109 of 2024

¶74

05.03.2024

¶75

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶76

Mohan @ Mohanasundaram v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan @ Mohanasundaram v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sriram Vs The Commissioner

K.Koppammal Vs the Special Tahsildar

Kudaloor Star Recreation Club Vs The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise

Thangaraj Vs .The Joint Commissioner

V.Thajudeen Vs The Commissioner

Abubacker Siddiq Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Customs