Disposed

Shajahan M v. the President

Madras HC13 Nov 2024WP(MD)/484/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai bench held that the petitioner, suspended under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act for alleged financial irregularities, be reinstated, but directed the Joint Registrar to expeditiously conclude ongoing disciplinary proceedings within four weeks before reconsidering the reinstatement. The petition was ultimately dismissed as the court directed completion of enquiries but noted n

What did the court decide?

Directed the third respondent to conclude disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner within four weeks; disposed of the writ petition without granting immediate reinstatement or subsistence allow

Shajahan M Vs the President — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP(MD)No.484 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 13.11.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

WP(MD)No.484 of 2022

M.Shajahan

.. Petitioner

1.The President, O.2009 Govindaperi Primary Agriculture Credit Society, Rawanasamudram,

¶11

Tenkasi District.

¶12

2.The Deputy Registrar, Deputy Co-operative Registrar Office, Railway Peter Road, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.

¶13

3.The Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, O/o.the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Sarvanthar Street, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶15

seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent

¶16

1/6

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP(MD)No.484 of 2022

¶19

to revoke the petitioner's suspension and reinstate the petitioner in service,

¶20

in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ajaykumar

¶21

Choudhary v. Union of India, reported in 2015 7 SCC 291, within a stipulated time limit.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mohamed Suhail For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader

¶23

¶24

ORDER

¶25

The petitioner is the Secretary of a Primary Agriculture Credit Society. He was suspended from service by order dated 24.09.2020 under Section 76(4) of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act']. This order of suspension dated 24.09.2020 is challenged before this Court.

¶26

2.Learned Counsel for the petitioner, by referring to the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ajaykumar Choudhary v. Union of India [ 2015 (7) SCC 291 ], submitted that the suspension order

¶27

2/6

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

WP(MD)No.484 of 2022

¶30

dated 24.09.2020 needs to be reviewed every six months. In this case, the suspension order dated 24.09.2020 was reviewed on 18.12.2020 and thereafter, it was not reviewed. Therefore, the suspension order needs to be set aside, in view of the ratio laid down in Ajay Kumar 's case. He further submitted that during the suspension period, the petitioner has not been paid with any subsistence allowance.

¶31

3.Learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents submitted that the petitioner / Secretary, along with the Clerk of the Society, has mortgaged fake jewels to the tune of Rs.9,97,000/- and caused loss to the Society. This was detected during the enquiry conducted u/s.81 of the Act, during the year 2020. The enquiry officer has submitted his report in the year 2021, based on which, a proceedings under Section 87 of the Act was contemplated as against this petitioner. The Deputy Registrar has also passed a surcharge order fixing the liability on the petitioner and one Muthuselvi, Clerk of the Society in SC.No.2/2021-2022 (RC.No. 941/2021SF), dated 20.03.2022.

¶32

3/6

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

WP(MD)No.484 of 2022

¶35

4.In this regard, a criminal case was also registered as against this petitioner and the Clerk in Crime No.2 of 2022 on 31.05.2022 and the investigation is in the crucial stage. The petitioner, being a Secretary, is the Chief Executive of the Society and not an employer and as such, he is not eligible for the subsistence allowance. He further submitted that a charge memo was also issued as against this petitioner in RC.No.4807/2020 dated 27.01.2022 and the enquiry is almost over.

¶36

5.This Court considered the rival submissions made on either side and perused the materials placed on record.

¶37

6.The grievance of the petitioner is that the suspension order dated 24.09.2020 has not been reviewed subsequently. The fact remains that the enquiry report u/s.81 of the Act has been submitted and consequent proceedings u/s.87 of the Act was also disposed of by the Deputy Registrar on 20.03.2022. The Department has also issued a charge memo to this petitioner on 27.01.2022 and the enquiry is nearing completion.

¶38

4/6

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

WP(MD)No.484 of 2022

¶41

7.In view of the above developments, this Court directs the third

¶42

respondent / Joint Registrar to conclude the disciplinary proceedings as against this petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶43

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶44

Index : Yes / No 13.11.2024 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes gk

¶45

¶46

1.The Deputy Registrar, Deputy Co-operative Registrar Office, Railway Peter Road, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.

¶47

2.The Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, O/o.the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Sarvanthar Street, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

5/6

¶50

WP(MD)No.484 of 2022

¶51

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶52

¶53

WP(MD)No.484 of 2022

¶54