7.It was also contended by the learned Senior Counsel, Mr.Sri Charan Rengarajan on behalf of the second respondent University that, when the University sent the petitioner's pension proposal to the Local Fund Audit Department for issuance of audit certificate by separate proceedings, the Local Fund Audit Department returned the petitioner's pension proposal citing excess pay fixation to the respective petitioners. Hence, pending audit objections, all these petitioners were paid only with 90% of pensionary benefits, as per the decision of the syndicate resolution, dated 24.05.2019. He further contended that, in the meanwhile, the Government issued G.O. (D).No.282, Higher Education (H2) Department, dated 13.10.2022, directing the University to review the pending audit objections and to take remedial actions by revising provisional pension based on the revised pay certified by the Local Fund Audit Department in order to sanction the grant to the University, on the basis of the undertaking given by the Vice Chancellor of the University. This was also approved by the syndicate, by its resolution, dated 20.01.2023. Subsequently, the University's finance committee in the meeting held on 18.04.2023, considered the loss incurred by the University due to the wrong fixation of pay and resolved to accept the Government letter (MS) No.174, dated 25.09.2013 and G.O.No.282, regarding the
