Disposed

Mahendran S v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC28 Feb 2024WP(MD)/4587/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought direction to disburse the Second Incentive Increment based on G.O.(1D)No.18 after completing M.Phil. The court directed the Headmaster to forward the proposal to the Chief Educational Officer within three weeks, who must pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to send proposal for Second Incentive Increment within 3 weeks and pass orders within 4 weeks.

Mahendran S Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.4587 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 28.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.4587 of 2024

¶7

S.Mahendran ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶10

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Theni District, Theni.

¶11

4.The Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Kottur, Theni. ... Respondents

¶12

1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

W.P.(MD).No.4587 of 2024

¶14

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse the Second Incentive Increment as per G.O.(1D)No.18, School Education Department dated 18.01.2013. Based on the proceedings of the Chief Education Officer - Theni / The 3^rd respondent issued in NA KA No.6529 / A3 / 2019 dated 23.10.2019.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Joseph Jerry For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam, Government Advocate

¶16

ORDER

¶17

By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶18

The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to disburse the Second Incentive Increment as per G.O.(1D)No.18, School Education Department dated 18.01.2013. Based on the proceedings of the Chief Education Officer - Theni passed by the 3^rd respondent dated 23.10.2019.

¶19

2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD).No.4587 of 2024

¶21

The brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of this Writ

¶22

Petition is as follows:-

¶23

The petitioner was initially appointed as a Noon Meal Organizer vide proceedings dated 05.01.2010. Thereafter, she was appointed as first Grade teaching staff in social science at Government High School, A. Udaiyan Patti, Karur on 02.07.2012, vide proceedings of the 2 nd respondent dated 23.06.2012. For the Master Decree completion, the petitioner received first incentive increment from the date of his joining. Further, he obtained prior permission to study M.Phil vide proceedings of the 2 nd respondent, during the academic year 2016-2017, he completed M.Phil. For which, he applied second incentive increment before the 4 th respondent through proper channel. Since the same was not considered by the respondents, the present writ petition came to be filed.

¶24

The learned Government Advocate on instructions submitted that the

¶25

proposal for second incentive increment should be sent to the 3^rd respondent through the 4^th respondent. However, the said exercise has not been done by the 4^th respondent.

¶26

3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD).No.4587 of 2024

¶28

Heard, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. Carefully perused the materials available on record.

¶29

In view of the same, I hereby direct the 4^th respondent to send proposal for grant of second incentive increment of the petitioner to the 3^rd respondent within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, 3^rd respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four (4) weeks therefrom.

¶30

Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶31

28.02.2024

¶32

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml

¶33

4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P.(MD).No.4587 of 2024

¶35

¶36

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶37

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-600 006.

¶38

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Theni District, Theni.

¶39

4.The Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Kottur, Theni.

¶40

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P.(MD).No.4587 of 2024

¶42

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶43

Sml

¶44

W.P.(MD).No.4587 of 2024

¶45

28.02.2024

¶46

6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mahendran S v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendran S v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shenbagam @ Shenbagavalli.G Vs Joint Commissioner of Labour

S.Sujatha Vs The Director of Collegiate Education

Kerenhap Evangelin. W Vs The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu

R.Nalli Meena Vs Karthika

D.Ananthakumar Vs The Managing Director

The Correspondent Vs The Chief Educational Officer