Murugan.a v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition seeking quashing of a notice for lease of fishing rights and direction for public auction was closed as infructuous upon the petitioner's counsel recording that the matter had become infructuous. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.4364 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 14.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.P.(MD).No.4364 of 2022 and
W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3688 and 3690 of 2022
A.Murugan
... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.
- 2.The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Pudukottai.
- 3.The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Thirumayam.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Murugan
- respondent
The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai
- respondent
The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Pudukottai
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Thirumayam
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department W.R.D Irrigation, Thirumayam Post & Taluk, Pudukottai District
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court