petitioner has settled his share in favour of the first petitioner, vide Document No.622/2002. Thereafter, in order to meet out the medical expenses, the first petitioner sold out some portion of the property to five persons from the year 2013 to 2015. Again, she sold another portion of the property to an extent of 9 cents in favour of one David, vide Document No.2483/2019 dated 19.08.2019. While so, the 5th respondent gave a complaint to the 3rd respondent on 17.09.2019, alleging that the subject property is the undivided joint family property, but, the 2nd petitioner has executed a settlement document in Doc.No. 622/2002 in favour of his wife in a fraudulent manner and based on the settlement, she sold the property to six persons and therefore, he sought for cancellation of all documents. Based on the said complaint, the 3rd respondent passed an order on 15.02.2022, holding that the Document No.622 of 2002 is a fraudulent document and therefore, subsequent registration of documents in pursuant to the said document are liable to be cancelled. Challenging the same, the petitioners have filed W.P.(MD)No.8175 of 2022. This Court, by order dated 26.04.2022, allowed the writ petition by quashing the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 15.02.2022 and remitted the matter back to the 3rd respondent for fresh consideration. Thereafter, the 3rd respondent has passed the impugned order dated 10.08.2022, holding that without partition, no
