Writ petition challenging a demand for deficit stamp duty and registration charges was closed because the petitioners had already paid the amounts and the registered document had been returned to them. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.3610 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.P.(MD) No.3610 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD) No.2912 of 2017
1.S.Sakthivel
2.Suganthi Blandina
.. Petitioners
Vs.
The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Virudhunagar.
.. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the respondent bearing Na.Ka.No.Aa1/154/2015 dated 25.01.2017 and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioners : Mr.I.Sam Jegan
For Respondent : Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader
_________Page 1 of 4
W.P.(MD) No.3610 of 2017
ORDER
Even though the writ petitioners challenge the demand, it has been brought on record that the petitioners had in fact paid the deficit stamp duty and the registration charges and the document had also been returned to the petitioners after registration.
06.12.2024
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes
abr
_________Page 2 of 4
W.P.(MD) No.3610 of 2017
To
The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Virudhunagar.
Page 3 of 4
W.P.(MD) No.3610 of 2017
K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
abr
W.P.(MD) No.3610 of 2017
Dated: 06.12.2024
_________Page 4 of 4
S.Sakthivel
Suganthi Blandina
The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Virudhunagar
K.Kumaresh Babu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
