Allowed

Senthil Kumar R v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC16 Apr 2024WP(MD)/3512/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a show cause notice for removal from service issued after a conviction in a criminal case. The Court held the notice liable to be set aside as the conviction was stayed pending appeal, with liberty to reissue based on the outcome of the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Impugned letter dated 06.01.2024 is set aside; respondent at liberty to reissue charge memo depending on criminal appeal outcome.

Senthil Kumar R Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP(MD) No.3512 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.04.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.3512 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD)No.3476 of 2024

¶7

R.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home (Pol.2) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9. ...Respondent

¶10

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the

¶11

records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in Letter No.e-29/Pol.2/2024-7, dated 06.01.2024 and quash the same.

¶12

1/6

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

WP(MD) No.3512 of 2024

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Dilipkumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in Letter No.e-29/Pol.2/2024-7, dated 06.01.2024 and quash the same.

¶18

Heard Mr.N.Dilipkumar, learned counsel for the

¶19

petitioner and Mr.M.Lingadurai, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

¶21

the petitioner was facing a criminal case in C.C.No.807 of 2019 and by virtue of the judgment, dated 16.10.2023, the trial Court convicted the petitioner and other accused. However, the petitioner challenged the same by way of filing criminal appeal in Crl.A. 2/6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

WP(MD) No.3512 of 2024

¶24

(MD)No.116 of 2023 and the same is pending. However, the order of conviction itself has been stayed by virtue of the order passed in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.83 of 2024 on 01.02.2024. When the suspension is pending, the petitioner has been given with a impugned show cause notice for removing the petitioner from service, in view of the conviction suffered by him.

¶25

Since the order of conviction has been stayed and the

¶26

matter is subjudice in view of the pending criminal appeal, the show cause notice is liable to be set aside.

¶27

The learned Special Government Pleader submitted

¶28

that as per the Rules, the petitioner is expected to offer his explanation. Even if the petitioner offers his explanation, no orders can be passed. The conviction has already been stayed. The charge memo has been issued only because the petitioner was convicted. As of now there is no enforceable order of conviction.

¶29

3/6

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

WP(MD) No.3512 of 2024

¶32

In view of the said reasons, this writ petition is

¶33

allowed and the impugned Letter No.e-29/Pol.2/2024-7, dated 06.01.2024 issued by the respondent is set aside. However, the respondent is at liberty to reissue the charge memo for the same reasons, depending upon the result of the Criminal Appeal or Criminal Revision Petition filed by the petitioner . No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶34

16.04.2024

¶35

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No

¶36

¶37

4/6

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

WP(MD) No.3512 of 2024

¶40

¶41

The Principal Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu Home (Pol.2) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶42

5/6

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

WP(MD) No.3512 of 2024

¶45

R.N.MANJULA, J.

¶46

¶47

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.3512 of 2024

¶48

Dated: 16.04.2024

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

6/6

Senthil Kumar R v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senthil Kumar R v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Petchiammal Vs The Secretary

S.Anthony Vs The District Collector

K.Sekar Vs The Registrar

Jeyarani.C Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

D.Geetha Thangamalar Vs The Chief Educational Officer

Nelson Leo Kevin Soosai.S Vs The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel)