Petitioner filed a writ petition to quash an administrative order regarding the administration of a society. The Special Government Pleader submitted the prayer had become infructuous. The court dismissed the petition on these grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.331of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.(MD)No.331of 2019
and W.M.P.(MD)No.268 of 2019 V.S.Navamani ... Petitioner
/Vs./
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records connected with the impugned order passed by the second respondent in No.3462 / E1 / 2018 dated 12.12.2018 and quash the same and direct the second respondent to appoint a special officer to administer the Society namely Victoria Edward Hall (Reg.No.16/1907-8) on the basis of representation made by the petitioner dated 08.06.2018 as forwarded by the first respondent in his letter No.28777/2018/M2 dated 03.07.2018 to the second respondent.
1/4
W.P.(MD)No.331of 2019
For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Kannan
For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan
Special Government Pleader for R1 & 2 : Mr.D.Nallathambi for R3
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to quash the impugned order passed by the second respondent in No.3462 / E1 / 2018 dated 12.12.2018 and to direct the second respondent to appoint a Special Officer to administer the Society, namely, Victoria Edward Hall (Reg.No.16/1907-8) on the basis of representation made by the petitioner dated 08.06.2018 as forwarded by the first respondent in his letter No. 28777/2018/M2 dated 03.07.2018 to the second respondent.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, would submit that the prayer sought for by the petitioner become infructuous.
2/4
W.P.(MD)No.331of 2019
3. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
26.11.2024
Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No LS
TO:-
3/4
W.P.(MD)No.331of 2019
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
LS
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.331 of 2019
Dated: 26.11.2024
V.S.Navamani
The District Collector, Madurai District
The District Registrar (Admn), Madurai South
Ismail
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
