Dismissed

Arulmigu Durgai Amman Temple v. The Commissioner Hr and Ce

Madras HC27 Mar 2024WP(MD)/3149/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court rejected the writ petition seeking to quash a notice inviting applications for non-hereditary appointment, holding that the petitioner failed to substantiate the claim of the temple being denomination-based with documents. Petitioner was directed to approach appropriate authority.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed with liberty to approach appropriate authority for a specific order establishing the temple's status.

Arulmigu Durgai Amman Temple Vs The Commissioner Hr… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.3149 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 27.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.3149 of 2023 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD) Nos.2923 and 2924 of 2023

¶8

Arulmigu Durgai Amman Temple, Rep by it's Manager, M.Balamurugan, No.75(1), Muslim Street, Thiruvedagam, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.The Commissioner H.R &C.E

¶12

Uthamar Ganthi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.

¶13

2.The Joint Commissioner H.R. &C.E, TNHB Colony, Ellis Nagar, Madurai-625016.

¶14

3.The Asst Commissioner H.R &C.E, TNHB Colony, Ellis Nagar, Madurai-625016.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

_________ Page 1 of 5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Prayer

¶19

W.P.(MD) No.3149 of 2023

¶20

Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned notice of the third respondent bearing Na.Ka.No.2630/2021-52/E3, dated 27.01.2023 and quash the same as illegal without jurisdiction.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Siva Ilayaraja

¶22

For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The petitioner claims to be the Manager of Arulmigu Durgai

¶25

Amman Temple, Madurai, has filed this writ petition as against the notification issued by the third respondent on 27.01.2023 inviting application for appointment of non-hereditary trustee of the said temple.

¶26

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this temple is

¶27

a denomination temple which belongs to the Mudaliyar Community and it is maintained by the petitioner's family for a long period. According to him, the Kumbabishekam of the said temple was also conducted by the petitioner and his family members. Without any notice and without

¶28

_________ Page 2 of 5

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.(MD) No.3149 of 2023

¶31

providing any opportunity, all of a sudden, the impugned notice was issued by the third respondent inviting applications for appointment of non-hereditary trustees.

¶32

Though the petitioner has claimed that it is a denomination temple and his family administered the temple, he has not placed any document to that effect. In the event, if the petitioner claims that the temple is a private temple or denomination temple, the petitioner can approach the appropriate authority and obtain an order to that effect. Without any order, this Court is not inclined to accept the contention of the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy before the appropriate authority by filing necessary application. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶33

27.03.2024

¶34

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No cp

¶35

_________ Page 3 of 5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.(MD) No.3149 of 2023

¶38

¶39

1.The Commissioner H.R &C.E Uthamar Ganthi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.

¶40

2.The Joint Commissioner H.R. &C.E, TNHB Colony, Ellis Nagar, Madurai-625016.

¶41

3.The Asst Commissioner H.R &C.E, TNHB Colony, Ellis Nagar, Madurai-625016.

¶42

Page 4 of 5

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P.(MD) No.3149 of 2023

¶45

B.PUGALENDHI,J

¶46

¶47

W.P.(MD)No.3149 of 2023

¶48

Dated: 27.03.2024

¶49

_________ Page 5 of 5

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Arulmigu Durgai Amman Temple v. The Commissioner Hr and Ce

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arulmigu Durgai Amman Temple v. The Commissioner Hr and Ce

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundhar Vs The Kumbakonam City Municipal Corporation

Mahalingam Vs The Joint Commissioner

Velmari Vs The Joint Commissioner

Sirajudeen .B Vs The Chairman

M/s.M R Tyres Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer

Rengasamy Velar.S Vs the Principal Secretary