Allowed

Raja v. The District Collector

Madras HC19 Oct 2024WP(MD)/3115/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged a suspension order for failing to submit an explanation allegedly due to non-submission within 15 days. The Court found the charge memo was served on 04.01.2024, granting time until 19.01.2024, making the suspension on 12.01.2024 illegal. The order was quashed, and the petitioner was directed to submit the explanation by a specified date.

What did the court decide?

Impugned suspension order set aside; petitioner directed to submit explanation by 11.11.2024; third respondent to complete enquiry in twelve weeks.

Raja Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.3115 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.3115 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD) No.3085 of 2024

Raja

... Petitioner

Vs.

The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Village Panchayat, Kariapatty Union, Virudhunagar District.

¶12

The President, Mudukankulam Village Panchayat, Kariapatty Union, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order of the second respondent made in Na.Ka. 01/2024, dated 12.01.2024, and quash the same, as arbitrary and illegal and to direct the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner for the post of Overhead Water Tank Operator.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

W.P.(MD).No.3115 of 2024

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The instant Writ Petition has been filed by an Overhead Water Tank Operator, working in the second respondent Panchayat, challenging the order of suspension dated 12.01.2024.

¶21

2. A perusal of the suspension order reveals that the petitioner has been placed under suspension primarily on the ground that the petitioner has not chosen to submit his explanation to the charge memo dated 29.12.2023 within a period of 15 days.

¶22

3. A perusal of the charge memo, dated 29.12.2023 reveals that the said charge memo has been served upon the petitioner only on 04.01.2024. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner has got time till 19.01.2024, to submit his explanation. However, the order of suspension has been passed on 12.01.2024 itself.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD).No.3115 of 2024

¶26

4. In view of the above said facts, the suspension order impugned in the writ petition is set aside and the petitioner is directed to submit his explanation to the charge memo on or before 11.11.2024 . Thereafter, the third respondent is directed to complete the enquiry within a period of twelve weeks from the date of submission of the reply by the writ petitioner.

¶27

5. With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands allowed to

¶28

the extent as stated above. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.

¶29

19.10.2024

¶30

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi

¶31

¶32

The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.

¶33

The Block Development Officer, Village Panchayat, Kariapatty Union, Virudhunagar District.

¶34

The President, Mudukankulam Village Panchayat, Kariapatty Union, Virudhunagar District.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/4

¶37

W.P.(MD).No.3115 of 2024

¶38

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

¶39

ebsi

¶40

W.P(MD)No.3115 of 2024

¶41

19.10.2024

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/4

Raja v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Visalam. S Vs Tamilnadu Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Limited

Subramanian. R Vs The District Collector

Manikandan Vs The Superintendent of Police

Ponnuraj.P Vs The State of Tamilnadu

R.Chellapandian Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

M.Gowthami Vs The State of Tamil Nadu