Allowed

C.Rajendiran v. The Director

Madras HC19 Nov 2024WP(MD)/27590/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking release of petitioner's land. Relying on a prior precursor order, the court held that under Sections 37 and 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, the land reserved under the Detailed Development Plan No.3 is deemed released as no acquisition declaration was published within three years of the notice.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to release the petitioner's land reserved under Detailed Development Plan No.3 of Cumbum Local Planning Authority as it was deemed released from reservation.

C.Rajendiran Vs The Director — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.27590 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.11.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.27590 of 2024

C.Rajendiran

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Director, Town and Country Planning, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.

¶11

The Deputy Director of Town And Country Planning, Theni.

¶12

The Member Secretary, Local Planning Authority, Cumbum Municipality, Cumbum.

¶13

The Commissioner, Cumbum Municipality, Cumbum, Theni District. ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to release the petitioner's land with an extent of 1 acre 80 cents in Cumbum Town Ward C Block No.5, T.S.No.17/6 and 17/7, Uthamapuram Village, Cumbum Town, Theni District earmarked for the “The Detailed Development Plan No.2 of

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/7

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.27590 of 2024

¶17

Cumbum Local Planning Authority” by treating “The Detailed Development Plan No.3 of Cumbum Local Planning Authority” as lapsed as per Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Santhosh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.D.S.Neduncheliyan (R1 & R2) Government Advocate Mr.K.Hema Karthikeyan (R3 & R4)

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The prayer in the Writ Petition reads as follows:-

¶21

“To direct the respondents herein to release the petitioner's land with an extent of 1 acre 80 cents in Cumbum Town Ward C Block No.5, T.S.No.17/6 and 17/7, Uthamapuram Village, Cumbum Town, Theni District earmarked for the “The Detailed Development Plan No.2 of Cumbum Local Planning Authority” by treating “The Detailed Development Plan No.3 of Cumbum Local Planning Authority” as lapsed as per Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.”

¶22

2. By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶23

2/7

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD)No.27590 of 2024

¶26

3. Heard the learned counsels on either sides and carefully perused the

¶27

entire materials available on record.

¶28

4. The matter in hand is no more res integra and this Court in another case in W.P.(MD)No.20277 of 2024, dated 23.09.2024, has already passed favourable order to the petitioner therein and the relevant portion of the same is extracted as follows:-

¶29

“5. It is relevant to extract Sections 37 and 38 of the Act for easy reference:~

¶30

'37.Power to purchase or acquire lands specified in the development plan.~

¶31

(1)Where after the publication of the notice in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette of preparation of a regional plan, master plan, detailed development plan or a new town development plan, as the case may be, any land is required, reserved or designated in such plan, the appropriate planning authority may, either enter into agreement with any person for the acquisition from him by purchase of any land which may be acquired under section 36 or make an application to the Government for acquiring such land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act I of 1984):

¶32

Provided that if the value of such land exceeds fifty thousand rupees the appropriate planning authority shall not enter into such agreement without the previous approval of the Government.

¶33

(2) On receipt of an application made under subsection (1), if

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/7

¶36

W.P.(MD)No.27590 of 2024

¶37

the Government are satisfied that the land specified in the application is needed for the public purpose specified therein, they may make a declaration to that effect in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, in the manner provided in section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act I of 1894), in respect of the said land. The declaration so published shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the said Act, be deemed to be a declaration duly made under the said section 6 of the said Act:

¶38

Provided that no such declaration in respect of any particular land covered by a notice under section 26 or section 27 shall be made after the expiry of three years from the date of such notice.

¶39

(3) On the publication of such declaration, the Collector of the district within whose jurisdiction the land is situate, shall proceed to take order for the acquisition of such land under the said Act; and the provisions of that Act shall, so far as may be, apply to the acquisition of the said land with the modification that the market value of the land shall be the market value prevailing on the date of publication of the notice in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette under section 26 or section 27, as the case may be.

¶40

38. Release of land.~ If within three years from the date of the publication of the notice in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette under section 26 or section 27~

¶41

(a) no declaration as provided in sub~section (2) of section 37 is published in respect of any land reserved, allotted or designated for any purpose specified in a regional plan, master plan, detailed development plan or new town development plan covered by such

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/7

¶44

W.P.(MD)No.27590 of 2024

¶45

notice; or

¶46

(b)such land is not acquired by agreement, such land shall be deemed to be released from such reservation, allotment or designation.'

¶47

6. A perusal of the above Sections make it very clear that within three years from the date of publication of the notice, if no acquisition of land is made in respect of any land reserved, allotted or designated for any purpose specified in a regional plan, master plan, detailed development plan or new town development plan covered by such notice, such land shall be deemed to be released from such reservation, allotment or designation. Though the proviso also enables the Government to issue notification extending the period, till date, no such notification has been issued.”

¶48

5. Fully fortified by the aforesaid order, this Court is of the considered view that the land belonging to the petitioner has not been acquired so far, within the mandatory period as required by Sections 37 and 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Such land shall be deemed to be released from such reservation. The respondents shall release the land of the petitioners, if there is no such notification issued.

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

5/7

¶51

W.P.(MD)No.27590 of 2024

¶52

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. There shall

¶53

be no order as to costs.

¶54

19.11.2024

¶55

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Sml

¶56

TO :-

¶57

The Director, Town and Country Planning, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.

¶58

The Deputy Director of Town And Country Planning, Theni.

¶59

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6/7

¶60

W.P.(MD)No.27590 of 2024

¶61

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶62

Sml

¶63

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.27590 of 2024

¶64

Dated 19.11.2024

¶65

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶66

7/7

C.Rajendiran v. The Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Rajendiran v. The Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Balamurugan Vs the Executive Engineer

Jenifer Parvin. a Vs The University Grand Commissioner (Ugc)

Harish Vs The Regional Passport Officer

Yamuna Nandhini.R Vs The District Collector

Thavamani. K Vs the Regional Director

Eswari Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer