The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents to issue a Work Site Inspection Certificate for participating in government tenders and to accept tender documents. The petitioner's counsel applied to withdraw the writ petition, which was permitted by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.26554 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 10.12.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.P.(MD).No.26554 of 2024 WMP(MD)Nos.22514, 22516 & 22517 of 2024
Kavitha
... Petitioner
Vs
2. The Divisional Engineer,
High Ways Department (C and M), Pudukkottai.
3. Senthil
4. Thamil Azhagan
... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to issue the Work Site Inspection Certificate to participate in Sl.No.1 of the Tender Notice No. 42 /2024-2025/HDO, Dated 05.10.2024 and Sl.No.1 of the Tender Notice No.43/2024-2025/HDO, Dated 07.10.2024, Sl.No.1 of the Tender Notice No. 45/2024-2025/ HDO, Dated 09.10.2024 and Sl.No.4, Sl.No. 5, Sl.No.6 (of the Tender Notice No. 46 /2024-2025/HDO, Dated 10.10.2024 in the alternate to direct the 1st respondent to accept the tender documents
1/4
W.P.(MD).No.26554 of 2024
uploaded by the petitioner without insisting the production of Work Site Inspection Certificate from the 2nd respondent for the above said works.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian
For Respondents : Mr.P.Veerakathiravan Additional Advocate General
Assisted by Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and also made an endorsement to that effect .
2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
10.12.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PNM
2/4
W.P.(MD).No.26554 of 2024
To
3/4
W.P.(MD).No.26554 of 2024
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
PNM
ORDER IN W.P.(MD).No.26554 of 2024 WMP(MD)Nos.22514, 22516 & 22517 of 2024
10.12.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue a Work Site Inspection Certificate and accept tender documents?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kavitha
The Superintending Engineer (H), Department of Highways (C and M), Trichy
The Divisional Engineer, High Ways Department (C and M), Pudukkottai
Senthil
Thamil Azhagan
L.VICTORIA GOWRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
