Periyasamy v. the Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed writ petition seeking benefit amount under PM Jeevan Jothi Beema Yojana due to wife's death. Court closed the petition as infructuous without costs upon representation by applicant's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD).No.2627 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 12.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.P.(MD).No.2627 of 2022
Periyasamy ... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The Manager, Planning and Development Department, Circle Office of Punjap National Bank, No.179, Khanta Enclave, Sorojini Street, Ram Nagar, Coimbatore.
- 2.The Branch Manager, Punjap National Bank, Kallimanthayam Branch, Kallimanthayam, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to disburse the benefit amount of Rs.2,00,000/- to the petitioner with appropriate interest as per the Prime Minister's Jeevan Jothi Beema Yojana Scheme at the instance of death of the petitioner's wife namely Valliyathal @ Valliammal, considering his detailed representation dated 12.01.2022.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Periyasamy
- respondent
1. The Manager, Planning and Development Department, Circle Office of Punjap National Bank, No.179, Khanta Enclave, Sorojini Street, Ram Nagar, Coimbatore
- respondent
2. The Branch Manager, Punjap National Bank, Kallimanthayam Branch, Kallimanthayam, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court