Disposed

Krishnaveni v. the District Collector

Madras HC23 Jan 2024WP(MD)/253/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought writ of mandamus to prevent disturbance of their possession of assigned house plots in Kakkavadi Village, Karur. As the assignments had been cancelled without notice and the cancellation was challenged in separate pending writ petitions, this court closed these petitions with liberty to raise the grounds there.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions closed with liberty to raise all grounds in pending W.P.(MD)Nos.1773 to 1776 of 2018; no costs.

Krishnaveni Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.01.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.269 to 272 of 2018

¶8

W.P.(MD)No.253 of 2018

Krishnaveni

... Petitioner

versus

The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

¶13

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District, Karur.

¶14

The Special Tahsildar, District Backward and Minority Welfare Office,

¶15

Karur,

¶16

Karur District.

¶17

The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Kulithalai, Karur District.

¶18

1/10

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶21

The Block Development Officer, Thanthonrimalai Union, Thanthonrimalai, Karur District.

¶22

... Respondents

¶23

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the 3^rd and 4^th respondents herein through themselves or through their men and agent from in any manner disturbing with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plot assigned to the petitioner in Plot No.11, S.F.No. 149/1 situated at Kakkavadi Village, Karur Taluk and District unless by due process of law.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gokul Raj For R1 to R4 : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.M.Raja Rajan

¶25

W.P.(MD)No.254 of 2018

Narasimman

... Petitioner

versus

The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

¶30

2/10

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶33

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District, Karur.

¶34

The Special Tahsildar, District Backward and Minority Welfare Office,

¶35

Karur,

¶36

Karur District.

¶37

The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Kulithalai, Karur District.

¶38

The Block Development Officer, Thanthonrimalai Union, Thanthonrimalai, Karur District. ... Respondents

¶39

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the 3^rd and 4^th respondents herein through themselves or through their men and agent from in any manner disturbing with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plot assigned to the petitioner in Plot No.12, S.F.No. 149/1 situated at Kakkavadi Village, Karur Taluk and District unless by due process of law.

¶40

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gokul Raj

¶41

3/10

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶44

For R1 to R4 : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.M.Raja Rajan

¶45

W.P.(MD)No.255 of 2018

Renganathan

... Petitioner

versus

The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

¶50

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District, Karur.

¶51

The Special Tahsildar, District Backward and Minority Welfare Office,

¶52

Karur,

¶53

Karur District.

¶54

The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Kulithalai, Karur District.

¶55

The Block Development Officer, Thanthonrimalai Union, Thanthonrimalai, Karur District.

¶56

... Respondents

¶57

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

¶58

4/10

¶59

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶60

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶61

seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the 3^rd and 4^th respondents herein through themselves or through their men and agent from in any manner disturbing with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plot assigned to the petitioner in Plot No.49, S.F.No. 149/1 situated at Kakkavadi Village, Karur Taluk and District unless by due process of law.

¶62

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gokul Raj

¶63

For R1 to R4 : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.M.Raja Rajan

¶64

W.P.(MD)No.256 of 2018

¶65

Ramamoorthy ... Petitioner

¶66

versus

¶67

The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

¶68

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District, Karur.

¶69

The Special Tahsildar, District Backward and Minority Welfare Office,

¶70

Karur, Karur District.

¶71

5/10

¶72

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶73

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶74

The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Kulithalai, Karur District.

¶75

The Block Development Officer, Thanthonrimalai Union, Thanthonrimalai, Karur District.

¶76

... Respondents

¶77

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the 3^rd and 4^th respondents herein through themselves or through their men and agent from in any manner disturbing with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plot assigned to the petitioner in Plot No.50, S.F.No. 149/1 situated at Kakkavadi Village, Karur Taluk and District unless by due process of law.

¶78

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gokul Raj

¶79

For R1 to R4 : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.M.Raja Rajan

¶80

6/10

¶81

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶82

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶83

COMMON ORDER

¶84

The petitioners claim that they were allotted plot Nos.11, 12, 49 and 50 respectively in S.F.No.149/1 situated at Kakkavadi Village, Karur Taluk and they have filed these writ petitions in the year 2018 to forbear the 3^rd and 4^th respondents herein, their men and agent from in any manner disturbing with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plot assigned to them.

¶85

Today, when these writ petitions are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the orders of assignment have been cancelled without issuing any notice to the petitioners. He further submits that as against the orders of cancellation of assignment, these petitioners have also filed separate writ petitions in W.P.(MD)Nos.1773 to 1776 of 2018 and the same are pending before this Court.

¶86

7/10

¶87

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶88

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶89

In view of the fact that the orders of assignment issued in

¶90

favour of the petitioners have been cancelled and the petitioners have also challenged the same by way of separate writ petitions in W.P. (MD)Nos.1773 to 1776 of 2018, these writ petitions are closed with liberty to the petitioners to raise all these grounds in W.P.(MD)Nos. 1773 to 1776 of 2018. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶91

23.01.2024

¶92

ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.

¶93

¶94

The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

¶95

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District, Karur.

¶96

The Special Tahsildar, District Backward and Minority Welfare Office,

¶97

Karur.

¶98

8/10

¶99

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶100

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶101

The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Kulithalai, Karur District.

¶102

The Block Development Officer, Thanthonrimalai Union, Thanthonrimalai, Karur District.

¶103

9/10

¶104

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶105

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶106

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶107

ogy

¶108

W.P.(MD)Nos.253 to 256 of 2018

¶109

23.01.2024

¶110

10/10

¶111

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Krishnaveni v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnaveni v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamaraj Packianath Vs The Regional Manager

M/s.Sri Jayalakshmi Transport Vs The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise

P.Ramuthai, Vs the District Collector

J.Jesurajan, Vs the Regional Director

Mr.v.Jeyaraman, Vs the Madurai Corporation

Sethurajan Padma Matriculation Vs the Madurai Corporation