Dismissed

Pechiammal v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC29 Oct 2024WP(MD)/25186/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A prisoner's relative sought a mandamus directing extension of the prisoner's leave by two months beyond 17.10.2024. The court noted the Superintendent had already rejected the representation by proceedings dated 03.10.2024 and dismissed the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

None; liberty to file a fresh writ petition in the nature of certiorari if so advised.

Pechiammal Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD) No.25186 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Date : 29.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA

¶6

W.P(MD) No.25186 of 2024

Pechiammal

... Petitioner

The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government Home(Prison IV) Department Fort St.George, Chennai -9

¶11

The Additional Director General of Prisons Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai 2^nd Floor, Gandhi IrwinRoad Egmofe, Chennai -8

¶12

The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Vellore

¶13

The Superintendent of Central Prison Central Prison, Cuddalore ... Respondents

¶14

1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P(MD) No.25186 of 2024

¶17

PRAYER:

¶18

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend the leave for further period of two months from 17.10.2024 as order by this Court in W.P(MD) No.21353 of 2024 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 02.10.2024 in accordance with law within a time stipulated by this Court.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Jeyasankar

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶21

ORDER

¶22

The writ petition has been filed in the nature of a Mandamus

¶23

seeking direction to extend the leave for further period of two months from 17.10.2024 as order by this Court in W.P(MD) No.21353 of 2024 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 02.10.2024

¶24

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor had forwarded a

¶25

copy of the proceedings dated 03.10.2024 passed by the fourth respondent , in No. 15248/jF.2/2024 and by way of that proceedings the representation of the petitioner had been rejected.

¶26

2/5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P(MD) No.25186 of 2024

¶29

3. In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. We

¶30

grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition in the nature of certiorary if so advised and directed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶31

(C.V.K., J.) (R.P, J.) 29.10.2024

¶32

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No aav

¶33

¶34

The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Home(Prison IV) Department Fort St.George, Chennai -9

¶35

The Additional Director General of Prisons Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai 2^nd Floor, Gandhi IrwinRoad Egmofe, Chennai -8

¶36

The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Vellore

¶37

3/5

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P(MD) No.25186 of 2024

¶40

The Superintendent of Central Prison Central Prison, Cuddalore

¶41

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶42

4/5

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P(MD) No.25186 of 2024

¶45

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R.POORNIMA, J.

¶46

aav

¶47

W.P(MD) No.25186 of 2024

¶48

29.10.2024

¶49

5/5

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Pechiammal v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pechiammal v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manikandan Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

M.Mallika Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government

N.Mariappan Vs Tha Addl Chief Secretary to Government

Gokila Vs Home, Prohibition and Excise Department

Imbrankhan alias Pooran Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

Gowsalya Palkannan Vs The Principal Secretary to Government